Re: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

[Steve Donovan <[e-mail]>]

Lionel,

I believe it is closed from a conceptual basis but text changes are 
required before it can be truly considered closed.  At least that is the 
process we have been following to date.

I will propose those text changes for review prior to closing the issue.

Steve

On 7/30/14, 10:24 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> As said during the meeting, you can consider this issue as closed.
> So please take it into account when reviewing the draft.
>
> Regards,
>
> Lionel
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : DiME [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Steve Donovan
> Envoyé : mardi 29 juillet 2014 21:22
> À : [e-mail]
> Objet : [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
>
> Issue @23 points out that there are two interpretations of the realm
> overload report in the current text.  One implies that a realm report
> applies to all requests sent to the realm, the other implies that it
> only applies to requests sent to the realm that does not contain a
> destination-host AVP.
>
> I believe we have consensus to use the second definition.
>
> There was also a proposal, made by me, to change the name of the report
> to something like "realm-routed-request" to be more accurate in defining
> what the scope of the overload report.  I no longer think this is
> necessary and am happy with the "realm" name for the report.
>
> If we have agreement on the direction then I will identify the text that
> needs to be changed to remove the conflicting definitions of the report
> type.  I will send it to the list for review before incorporating it
> into the -04 version of the draft and closing the issue.
>
> Please let me know if there are issues with this proposal.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>