IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] DIME Meeting Notes

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Fri, 27 November 2009 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CB93A684D for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.240, BAYES_40=-0.185, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LR0V-NbuakIf for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.104]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0918F3A6784 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP55 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s29.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:35 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [70.54.11.20]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP557D57083C147D38F05FCAD89A0@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.11] ([70.54.11.20]) by BLU0-SMTP55.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:49:34 -0800
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:49:30 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <000001ca66cf$75efe580$03ffa8c0@nsnintra.net>
In-Reply-To: <000001ca66cf$75efe580$03ffa8c0@nsnintra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2009 16:49:35.0147 (UTC) FILETIME=[9992A7B0:01CA6F81]
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] DIME Meeting Notes
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:49:41 -0000

In the discussion of the ERP draft, didn't we at some point realize that a 
change of authenticator could be accompanied by a change of service needing 
authorization? This doesn't change the basic conclusion that authentication and 
authorization should be separate steps, but should it be mentioned? Maybe change 
Hannes' initial summary from "home domain does not need to be aware" to "home 
domain does not need to be aware unless change of service involved".

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> Here are the meeting minutes from the DIME WG meeting:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/minutes/dime.txt
> 
> Thanks to Jouni for the writeup. 
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status