Re: [Dime] OVLI: OC-Validity-Duration

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 12 December 2013 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C131AE13E for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xwoQMqYt4xtv for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3115C1AE1F7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id eo20so62806lab.14 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UmtFBjeKHfHMcMvhKtzBmQhh9FgtK1VCdnOMdPxyrjQ=; b=ITpLut5iFQdYGEDWmtNkL8OFbALeGIfP5Xg+Vr5735U3/cvZyJmIi7qkBSVAit0r50 a79QibV3NPbueWmh5op/TkuSIJjg9OfQM47mbHroVNcQZRbkRqQQCpH7Lg+wStZxYP0z UMsA9gbbIie+Ul+1YeGytRBb7tc23kJtXM4Rg8mjz62kcYAGySuLqDeKjnOo9zOxzuCG NcfHKrSp/SVmZ2JTqo4N4d1YZbauMr8U84mHTrwkSk9rFDY3SiiPhhIH4qseeDcmUYmj aNdbhTSx4Mvg8ZP0K2AEe9pAKRu6J8EuQPVkNetfx/wUW1SlU0cLXyf3g0Ym/Vm0gbVs OmUw==
X-Received: by 10.152.115.230 with SMTP id jr6mr2977628lab.45.1386837515482; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.250.53] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id di11sm33353408lac.0.2013.12.12.00.38.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920973AB4B@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:38:34 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8A3170E-3C42-4506-A22D-B947B2D03E54@gmail.com>
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920973AB4B@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
To: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] OVLI: OC-Validity-Duration
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:38:44 -0000

Hi,

I kind of like scheduled cleanups.. just to make sure there is no
stuff left hanging around when something unpredictable happens in
the network system.

Again, I would say this is a wrong place to "optimize".


- Jouni

On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>; wrote:

> Dear all,
>  
> I would like to reconsider the real need for the OC-Validity-Duration AVP to be included into overload report.
> Overload mechanism is being design with a principle in mind: as soon as reporting node determines a reacting node overload behavior should change, reporting node sends a fresh overload report to this reacting node.
> Therefore, latest overload report received will be always applicable until a new report is received, and then I do not see the value, but just complexity, of including a Duration in the report.
>  
> Let me know your views.
> Best regards
> /MCruz
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime