[Dime] Further comments on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-00.txt

"P O'Hanlon" <p.ohanlon@gmail.com> Thu, 06 May 2010 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <p.ohanlon@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93AC3A692D for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2010 10:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NCtp4MFTfbdT for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2010 10:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3303A6A81 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2010 10:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so55773eyf.51 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2010 10:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=APLWbajDMN266ODpWAsr1SEtTOe/hl2okrAtD6ML7yM=; b=FOZZOQAbSVfI5QoS8cv2Nir6IBByz6Un5Y9oCyp3AipcoVYnotNGNyyqnNTyc1Fvsr SNu1Qr0XvumbcFmHo4o7wMkj4YlBt7yQR1VflsMl/xELibdCscrXqsMQWIN8wTaIQQ8t yOGv/x+umdG50y2iZ5c6ZsRfYybnUw5V738Qk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=wB7ZYUFtAmkyn/m0iHLM9CWl/xc1KPCjMtBqRAqQNd5qr0TSvmTP9aa5X6BYKKrCUs up0CubWTGUAnvT++bXPnXXWEVfg2eNGDlGDV7GZ3AlhoQUAwXmPL0krdZKx+rM5X65iN /4/JThFrdWfWnE/eagE1IwmikYStSzR1Pd+ho=
Received: by 10.213.91.76 with SMTP id l12mr8213810ebm.47.1273166140604; Thu, 06 May 2010 10:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.16.77 with HTTP; Thu, 6 May 2010 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: P O'Hanlon <p.ohanlon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 18:15:18 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikITj3OOROhAxIPGSb6a8MFT2_7BZzHsNA4baoL@mail.gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [Dime] Further comments on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: p.ohanlon@cs.ucl.ac.uk
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 17:16:26 -0000

A few more comments.

Sec 3.
- It's probably worth adding a specific reference for the "DIAMETER
QoS application.." ie soon-to-be RFC5866 (see:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos-15)

Sec 5.
- It would be good to add some explanatory text to the example.

Where SIP is mentioned it may be useful to state any implications or
otherwise for "Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application"
(RFC4740). At a minimum it should be mentioned in Section 5 as it
refers to the MAA/MAR messages defined in RFC4740.

Piers