[Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 11 May 2016 17:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dime@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BFD12D0F7; Wed, 11 May 2016 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.20.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160511173425.15223.72665.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:34:25 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/6XxW_0dC1YtzA7zrDuzF8SIEoYI>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org, dime-chairs@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 17:34:25 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-drmp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I still think this part needs further clarification mostly regarding applicability and maybe a warning as it could lead to starvation of requests that do not define a priority, e.g. because there are not supporting it (yet) while effectively having a higher priortiy than the requests that they get starved by: "When using DRMP priority information, Diameter nodes MUST use the default priority for transactions that do not have priority specified in a DRMP AVP."
- [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Stephen Farrell