[Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 comment #3

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D0D1AE415 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 04:27:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HE5wWVyX0TuD for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 04:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F2A1AE35B for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 04:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q8so8178713lbi.26 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:27:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=gWyhmOircdFWizaGms0mLUZb7vWbsmEwvqGdJSdk0IY=; b=cil+FtFxyEBmeN9ACHEhVAD0A2hibUZS+zl7y0lqkPKOqG3PwQWNjYaUzc0p8bcx7n KLPOPEncqCG/abh/wiprkysiPd6BCGELt/dXJYhBeQp1IzlPiVl6FgwPqBJWsgyjcvJQ yUqegz93RbOvcWXDsvqbY8AZnCHV4vt/g7CDkjZLsQ0PxxaytstdmFIxgAt4xY9WvQSO dHgeEVtxvShjI/Ua6Nie0yvgJ5/Zl5kO7+SNUuSVSu8n+AZM8PglHx2etvED8RcbXFcM VbK0h0n5SF8dXeeo3a3bLUxrJtBthu7dGCGHOdJCB+Qo5Y+1CPbZuAY8E5aI5F3C/Y2W BEgA==
X-Received: by 10.112.180.37 with SMTP id dl5mr264488lbc.58.1385987257336; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bo10sm31887376lbb.16.2013.12.02.04.27.36 for <dime@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:27:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <CC4B7FD8-2E9F-42B5-B05F-6AF0B8DC6739@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:27:35 +0200
To: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Subject: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 comment #3
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:27:42 -0000

I brought back the initial features flag for the default abatement
algorithm. It was pointed out to me that just the absence of the
OC-Feature-Vector AVP is not adequate enough in a case multiple
supported abatement algorithms get announced and something specific
is needed to be said about the default algorithm (like the other end
specifically does not want to use it).

- Jouni