Re: [Dime] [dime] #25: Section 3.1.5 Diameter Agent Behavior

Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0DD1A00B0 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:51:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IBo6KkEPUVE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0A1A0072 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 02:51:56 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb32-b7f4c8e0000012f5-a8-5305de479b0f
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg20.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E5.86.04853.74ED5035; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:51:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB101.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.28]) by ESESSHC006.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.36]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:51:51 +0100
From: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #25: Section 3.1.5 Diameter Agent Behavior
Thread-Index: AQHPLbFTvFcqfjVsjE6LjesyeHyOBpq99xjg
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:51:51 +0000
Message-ID: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783CFA@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
References: <066.bb0f61f3d4c3a1f543554c66031a4edd@trac.tools.ietf.org> <53051431.9000800@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <53051431.9000800@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783CFAESESSMB101erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja7HPdZggw/3OSzm9q5gc2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxu8j3ewFE4Irrp69wNLA+Cagi5GTQ0LAROLh01ZmCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgInGCVmP3rGCOEsZpQ4snMTC0gVm4CdxKXTL5i6GDk4RASUJU7/cgAJCwu4Ssx6 088OYosIuEnMmL2SFaLESGJVhwtImEVAVWLvuy1MIDavgK/EjgsrGUFsIYEsiWtTmtlAbE4B PYnvM0+A2YxA93w/tQasnllAXOLWk/lMEHcKSCzZcx7qZlGJl4//sULYShIrtl9ihKjPl5j1 7T4bxC5BiZMzn7BMYBSZhWTULCRls5CUzQK6mllAU2L9Ln2IEkWJKd0P2SFsDYnWOXPZkcUX MLKvYpQsTi0uzk03MtDLTc8t0UstykwuLs7P0ytO3cQIjKODW34b7WA8ucf+EKM0B4uSOO91 1pogIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi+KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYwrjz0X+a1dMv1YU+YOtubmOY8ap96U8bwR +M4rUebjw9s+gmsmXOZzSG5Tuxhg7Hyqomj2SecDXkLGpwonzI/LyK9OPBR5w+GSuVNJufT1 v6E22W72BpJn9mvsY3JabHdQLmeescj35vtmL8rXprDoeUi26CVsj7eRWuvkkbXdv0R8+7aw tUosxRmJhlrMRcWJAIMJwxRxAgAA
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/85jkLKUIfdVsB3H6qOhazE1J2rs
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #25: Section 3.1.5 Diameter Agent Behavior
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:51:59 -0000

Hello Steve, all,

The intention of chapters 3.1.5 and 5.5 is totally different.
In order to be able to agree or disagree I would need to have a written proposal of the changes and an explanation of the reason for these changes.

Best regards
/MCruz

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: miércoles, 19 de febrero de 2014 21:30
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #25: Section 3.1.5 Diameter Agent Behavior

There has been no discussion of this ticket.

After further thought, I propose that this section be removed and the requirements for agents acting as reporting nodes for host reports be included in section 5.5.

If the section is kept then I propose removing the term "topology hiding" and use server front end instead.  If we take this approach then we need to have a definition of SFE in the terminology section.

Steve

On 1/28/14 2:18 PM, dime issue tracker wrote:

#25: Section 3.1.5 Diameter Agent Behavior



 This applies to draft-ietf-dime-ovli.



 There are a number of concepts mentioned in this section that are not

 sufficiently defined.  This includes Server Front End, topology hiding SFE

 and back-to-back agent.



 I suggest that we add the definition of SFE back to the terminology

 section.



 I also suggest that we start using the term "Server Identity Hiding" and

 not use the term Topology Hiding.  Topology Hiding has a meaning outside

 of DOIC that does not fit for DOIC.



 I also think we should remove the concept of back-to-back agent.