IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dime] Issue#35 conclusion

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D2B1A0137 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 04:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UHmEPW5Vcuy8 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 04:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BB61A013C for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 04:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1KCffmD010896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:41:41 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1KCfeiB007472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:41:40 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC006.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.37) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:41:40 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.242]) by DEMUHTC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:41:40 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Issue#35 conclusion
Thread-Index: Ac8uORl1Xn9wvmyrSf2I+rd4YT2PBg==
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:41:39 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3F63@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.119]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3F63DEMUMBX014nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1874
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1392900101-00005322-07380963/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/9yDfWeT5WZZ-BLrrnMXXXaLLRCI
Subject: [Dime] Issue#35 conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:41:51 -0000

#35: additional report types are proposed

Dear all,

I believe we can conclude, not to add additional report types. However, we agreed to add clarifying text to clause 5.5 as follows:

When an agent received an OLR in response to a request initiated by a client not supporting DOIC, this agent needs to bind the received OLR to the origin-host of the client.

Ulrich

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email