Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history - conclusion
Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155E1A0316 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4PgbTvqRBZ5O for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:36:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68BE1A01B7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:36:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:54899 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WGs9i-0006Mf-1l for dime@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:36:54 -0800
Message-ID: <53077290.8080501@usdonovans.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:36:48 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209784017@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209784017@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040509040706040808000208"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/AJG93XT-L1mqN9DAGEVTKWQaUwk
Subject: Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history - conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:37:01 -0000
Maria Cruz, I support your suggested changes. I have one further suggested change below. Steve On 2/21/14 2:40 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome wrote: > #52: Throttling not needed to be based on previous history > > Following agreement is reached: > > Now (chapter 4.7): > The OC-Reduction-Percentage AVP (AVP code TBD8) is type of Unsigned32 > and describes the percentage of the traffic that the sender is > requested to reduce, compared to what it otherwise would have sent. > > Proposal: > The OC-Reduction-Percentage AVP (AVP code TBD8) is type of Unsigned32 > and describes the percentage of the traffic that the sender is > requested to reduce, compared to what it otherwise would send. <---- > > > Now (chapter 5.5.2): > Indicates that the reporting node urges the reacting node to > reduce its traffic by a given percentage. For example if the > reacting node has been sending 100 packets per second to the > reporting node, then a reception of OC-Reduction-Percentage value > of 10 would mean that from now on the reacting node MUST only send > 90 packets per second. How the reacting node achieves the "true > reduction" transactions leading to the sent request messages is up > to the implementation. The reacting node MAY simply drop every > 10th packet from its output queue and let the generic application > logic try to recover from it.0 < value < 100 > > Proposal: > Indicates that the reporting node urges the reacting node to reduce > its traffic by a given percentage. For example if the > reacting node would send 100 packets to the <--- > reporting node, then a reception of OC-Reduction-Percentage value of > 10 would mean that from now on the reacting node MUST only send > 90 packets instead of 100. How the reacting node achieves the "true <--- > reduction" transactions leading to the sent request messages is up to > the implementation. The reacting node MAY simply drop every 10th > packet from its output queue and let the generic application logic try > to recover from it. SRD> Replace "from now on" in the above with "for the period that the overload report is active" > > _______________________________________________ > DiME mailing list > DiME@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >
- [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based on … Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Dime] #52: Throttling not needed to be based… lionel.morand