IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] [dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Wed, 12 February 2014 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ADD1A08D3 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:16:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CH5zYYWy13ul for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26041A08BA for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:16:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1C9Gk7H028048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:16:46 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1C9Gk1D014159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:16:46 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.40) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:16:46 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.242]) by DEMUHTC009.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:16:46 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com" <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests
Thread-Index: AQHPJ8dJMvhOqgSOVkGQ3fH3JyWghZqxViIg
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:16:46 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B2F32@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
References: <075.edaabec86a9d8f96dc7c8731cb6d4ef2@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <075.edaabec86a9d8f96dc7c8731cb6d4ef2@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.106]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1956
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1392196607-00001A6F-AC77D7EC/0-0/0-0
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:16:52 -0000

I agree.

Absence of OC-Supported-Features AVP from a request means "DOIC not supported".
Ulrich

-----Original Message-----
From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext dime issue tracker
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:52 AM
To: maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] [dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests

#51: OC-Supported-Features in requests

 Now:
 The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter
 message a DOIC
 supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).

 Why is "should" used?

 Proposal: replace SHOULD by MUST

-- 
-----------------------------------------------+---------------------------
 Reporter:  maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com  |      Owner:  MCruz
     Type:  defect                             |  Bartolomé
 Priority:  major                              |     Status:  new
Component:  draft-docdt-dime-ovli              |  Milestone:
 Severity:  Active WG Document                 |    Version:  1.0
                                               |   Keywords:
-----------------------------------------------+---------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/51>
dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email