Re: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

<lionel.morand@orange.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717FC1A019B for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzL20ldmF5po for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0871A0114 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D1CA0325522; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:24:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B49E04C0CA; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:24:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:24:35 +0200
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
Thread-Index: AQHPq2Jx3rQsneshpEqvUXHZZd+3bZu4vTxA
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:24:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4485_1406733875_53D90E33_4485_11209_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E6827AB@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <53D7F470.3090500@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <53D7F470.3090500@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.7.30.103920
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/B5gyGKGO692Yg6xVwro6hWLDmrU
Subject: Re: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:25:45 -0000

Hi Steve,

As said during the meeting, you can consider this issue as closed.
So please take it into account when reviewing the draft.

Regards,

Lionel  

-----Message d'origine-----
De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Steve Donovan
Envoyé : mardi 29 juillet 2014 21:22
À : dime@ietf.org
Objet : [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

Issue @23 points out that there are two interpretations of the realm 
overload report in the current text.  One implies that a realm report 
applies to all requests sent to the realm, the other implies that it 
only applies to requests sent to the realm that does not contain a 
destination-host AVP.

I believe we have consensus to use the second definition.

There was also a proposal, made by me, to change the name of the report 
to something like "realm-routed-request" to be more accurate in defining 
what the scope of the overload report.  I no longer think this is 
necessary and am happy with the "realm" name for the report.

If we have agreement on the direction then I will identify the text that 
needs to be changed to remove the conflicting definitions of the report 
type.  I will send it to the list for review before incorporating it 
into the -04 version of the draft and closing the issue.

Please let me know if there are issues with this proposal.

Regards,

Steve

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.