[Dime] Comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03
Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Sun, 09 May 2010 23:55 UTC
Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CF828C0F1 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_50=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1K8t7MDM8No for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s14.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s14.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.89]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A535028C0DB for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2010 16:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP85 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s14.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 9 May 2010 16:55:29 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [70.26.23.183]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP8523E3B4E0B54ECE65D1B3D8F80@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.11] ([70.26.23.183]) by BLU0-SMTP85.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 9 May 2010 16:55:28 -0700
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 19:55:25 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, wuqin <sunseawq@huawei.com>, Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2010 23:55:29.0086 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A3D8DE0:01CAEFD3]
Subject: [Dime] Comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 23:55:41 -0000
I have a couple of comments on draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-03. 1) As suggested in my previous E-mail, the attributes contained in the Key AVP should probably include an applicable domain identifier (in the absence of which the key is not domain-specific), and an enumeration indicating usage. The two usages I see are reauthentication root key and master session root key. In a bow to RFC 5295, I suppose DSRK should be added to and stand at the head of this list. Obviously the usage list has to be extensible -- another IANA registry. 2) Minor comment: I would think section 5.2 itself would contain a table listing the values to be registered. Of course, if my suggestion is adopted the details of this will be different. Tom taylor