[Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #2

Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C871AE45B for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBxlGDS_Tq4q for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:25:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x236.google.com (mail-bk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35D81AE459 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v16so5312049bkz.27 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:25:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=v8PU9NBiefJqRVMAATbsnDQrHS5L6FS6M8P0+xx0fN0=; b=0vm+GW2yCIiSH/uDUHIR9AgfyEChDMWAc+XFvcEZOj9I+2IJjLmWAQY3/QkojEvmj9 XHVC+2D6BbLW2Vjzzla0cVj6J4LrTN9MeLyOQuG0cRxKWExOGe/Qh5gSBDtOTKP0kVlU U3OF7BwxnX6UgiVbcfRL0zD8zTaMQVePL1a0EAewjXVnxu1wWSxlB7jvixHkHWqv9Nzc qZs2r68UMzipdzSr2AssK8N/va9zwq7IX/brfv0N0GUrL0UMkEoodtXpl+vqUBUIB2PZ JlMNs2Q699ahw6Tg0/PrLdd8XSAGpZlZuyLPu0NEO9JU+C83lfT/TEMLqj1pZnqtVZ7X 4c/A==
X-Received: by 10.205.18.73 with SMTP id qf9mr15398893bkb.12.1385972701832; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:403:b3e3:4af7:8d0a? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:403:b3e3:4af7:8d0a]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm21382367bkz.4.2013.12.02.00.25.01 for <dime@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:25:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:24:59 +0200
Message-Id: <2D60D862-45C5-4B13-96E6-F9621AF33759@gmail.com>
To: "DiME@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Subject: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #2
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:25:06 -0000

In Section 3.1.1 where pseudo-session applications are discussed shouldn't
we also state that the pseudo-session application is somewhat a SDO specific
jewel? IMHO it is not really what RFC6733 session-less application is,
although from the base protocol point of view it is compliant.

- Jouni