Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20B11ADBCD for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:38:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyWCOh40hKun for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B350E1ADEC0 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.10.7] (mobile-166-147-068-041.mycingular.net [166.147.68.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBGLcmos097044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:38:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920975651D@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:38:43 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C592D376-89C5-4D0F-8549-6CE1B8698396@nostrum.com>
References: <70089680-BBFD-4E4C-B550-30FEAB5C611C@gmail.com> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920975651D@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
To: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 166.147.68.41 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:38:58 -0000

I agree with submitting 01. 

I disagree about removing controversial text, although I don't mind marking it as controversial. But I think it would be a better approach would be to take 01 as a baseline and start putting open issues in the issue tracker.

On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>; wrote:

> Hello Jouni, all,
> 
> We got some open discussion without any conclusion yet, if you prefer to publish .01 version, I would suggest these open issues are properly covered there, or all related text is omitted.
> Cheers
> /MCruz
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:47
> To: dime@ietf.org list
> Subject: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I am somewhat tempted to publish -01 even if we still have some very rough edges and then continue from there. Any strong disagreements?
> 
> The place we lack text more or less entirely is Section 5.5.3. (for a reason) but will type in something later tonight (or so).
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime