Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

I agree with submitting 01. 

I disagree about removing controversial text, although I don't mind marking it as controversial. But I think it would be a better approach would be to take 01 as a baseline and start putting open issues in the issue tracker.

On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hello Jouni, all,
> 
> We got some open discussion without any conclusion yet, if you prefer to publish .01 version, I would suggest these open issues are properly covered there, or all related text is omitted.
> Cheers
> /MCruz
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
> Sent: lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:47
> To: dime@ietf.org list
> Subject: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I am somewhat tempted to publish -01 even if we still have some very rough edges and then continue from there. Any strong disagreements?
> 
> The place we lack text more or less entirely is Section 5.5.3. (for a reason) but will type in something later tonight (or so).
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime