[Dime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6733 (4210)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 07 January 2015 08:34 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70861A00C3; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 00:34:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wl7kXBp2xR0y; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 00:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAAE1A00F4; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 00:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CC624181CDC; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 00:33:52 -0800 (PST)
To: Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com, vf0213@gmail.com, jari.arkko@ericsson.com, john.loughney@nokia.com, glenzorn@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150107083352.CC624181CDC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:33:52 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/DNnHNeBRaU6xis1lhL2F3w6hY14
Cc: dime@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Dime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6733 (4210)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:34:21 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6733, "Diameter Base Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6733&eid=4210 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Hans Liu <Hans.Liu@alcatel-lucent.com> Date Reported: 2014-12-25 Held by: Benoit Claise (IESG) Section: 5.4.3 Original Text ------------- The Disconnect-Cause AVP (AVP Code 273) is of type Enumerated. A Diameter node MUST include this AVP in the Disconnect-Peer-Request message to inform the peer of the reason for its intention to shut down the transport connection. The following values are supported: REBOOTING 0 A scheduled reboot is imminent. A receiver of a DPR with above result code MAY attempt reconnection. BUSY 1 The peerâs internal resources are constrained, and it has determined that the transport connection needs to be closed. A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection. DO_NOT_WANT_TO_TALK_TO_YOU 2 The peer has determined that it does not see a need for the transport connection to exist, since it does not expect any messages to be exchanged in the near future. A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection. Corrected Text -------------- The Disconnect-Cause AVP (AVP Code 273) is of type Enumerated. A Diameter node MUST include this AVP in the Disconnect-Peer-Request message to inform the peer of the reason for its intention to shut down the transport connection. The following values are supported: REBOOTING 0 A scheduled reboot is imminent. A receiver of a DPR with above result code MAY attempt reconnection. BUSY 1 The internal resources are constrained, and it has determined that the transport connection needs to be closed. A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection. DO_NOT_WANT_TO_TALK_TO_YOU 2 The node has determined that it does not see a need for the transport connection to exist, since it does not expect any messages to be exchanged in the near future. A receiver of a DPR with above result code SHOULD NOT attempt reconnection. Notes ----- A peer can either be a sender or receiver, depending on the contexst. However in same section describing usage for the same AVP (description for cause), the 1st appearance represents the role of receiver, the 2nd and 3rd appearances has changed to the role of senders, it's confusing literally. -------------------------------------- RFC6733 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Base Protocol Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : V. Fajardo, Ed., J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4210) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4… LIU Hans
- [Dime] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6733 … RFC Errata System
- Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6733 (4… Benoit Claise