Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: (with COMMENT)
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 06 August 2015 07:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C911AD05E; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 00:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z2wiY0gCKOHk; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 00:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias244.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF891AD055; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 00:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id E555B374363; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.2]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B8403158078; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:58:07 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQzsm3NOVpOdOt6UKcOajIStyRBp3+knNg
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 07:58:06 +0000
Message-ID: <32086804-cc33-4842-b972-431b71d9149b@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20150804152348.1378.21580.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150804152348.1378.21580.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.8.6.70616
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/EYekyO31sUaGhDs-FOPmDzhteAk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning@ietf.org>, "dime-chairs@ietf.org" <dime-chairs@ietf.org>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.shepherd@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.ad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 07:58:16 -0000
Hi Spencer, Thank you for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com] > Envoyé : mardi 4 août 2015 17:24 > À : The IESG > Cc : MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN; dime-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dime-4over6- > provisioning@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.ad@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.shepherd@ietf.org; dime@ietf.org > Objet : Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6- > provisioning-04: (with COMMENT) > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > A nit - this text > > [RFC6519] sets a precedent for representation of the IPv6 address of > a border router as an FQDN. This can be dereferenced to one or more > IP addresses by the provisioning system before being passed to the > customer equipment, or left as an FQDN as it as in [RFC6334]. > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > [Med] Fixed. > seems garbled. > > In this text > > 3.4.1. Delegated-IPv6-Prefix As the IPv6 Binding Prefix > > The Delegated-IPv6-Prefix AVP (AVP code 123) is of type Octetstring, > and is defined in [RFC4818]. Within the Tunnel-Source-Pref-Or-Addr > AVP, it conveys the IPv6 Binding Prefix assigned to the CE. Valid > values in the Prefix-Length field are from 0 to 128 (full address), > although a more restricted range is obviously more reasonable. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > I wonder if "obviously more reasonable" is the right thing to say. Is > this saying something like "more scalable" (compared to bunches of > 128-bit IP binding prefixes)? Or am I misunderstanding the point? > [Med] "more reasonable" is used because hosts are usually provisioned with prefixes such as /48, /56 or /64 (which are "restricted ranges"). We can delete "although a more restricted range is obviously more reasonable" if this is confusing.
- [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-iet… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [Dime] [dime] Re: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection o… Qiong
- Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Dime] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft… mohamed.boucadair