Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.3

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 09 December 2013 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6959E1AE227 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:59:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z83zpU9ewdvW for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x229.google.com (mail-bk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DEE1ADEDC for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v15so1249629bkz.14 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:59:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W0dTJ9O672Hx77Z9SbR0TnmqJqRdIYdvQM0pZj7iXrA=; b=tAZWyBzZfPwWbJIiqWsMglCrejDFm3b1tFe1rc2/Lrehd2pxp/pnB+sAsF3hxD3W7B ACVn8Owo7S0wGecRU0PT0x/seVI8bs/5x78jVytZZ1Bg+kwSIrDViy2QHXz8ksNbeTtS Tp4YhR20y3/oHVAq2NIVEuYMSQieIi2Penjx8n4nefMuQ1/1Ry7KI7KoGHCLl5oR37z3 nWbVzagbZsxIDU9ETaOerDJjOFcB2tyL6bVyjF3rKjvfj6sPtdnM7y6zOPs4rosQXc7P xvi/kd3Ks6WOUyIGZgA7HYeLONd62ywal3nRTPUM1/2il2zyxte6izjIfCGB3Z1pr7va JO8Q==
X-Received: by 10.204.73.5 with SMTP id o5mr5533745bkj.37.1386579562653; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:1bc8:101:f101:a875:9b2c:596e:b87d? ([2001:1bc8:101:f101:a875:9b2c:596e:b87d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qg7sm7978756bkb.6.2013.12.09.00.59.18 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DD2A@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:59:18 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38D0E021-23B2-4DDB-BCCF-914DB11AA2EE@gmail.com>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DB1B@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <AA10DFBD-CAC9-4B7B-8876-A4F28E63D83F@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DD2A@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.3
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:59:30 -0000

Ulrich,

On Dec 6, 2013, at 3:39 PM, "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> wrote:

> Dear Jouni,
> 
> thanks again. 
> 
> Why isn't it so that others need to convince me/us?

;-) Mainly because you brought it up.. and are currently
the one who wants this part to be changed.

- Jouni

> 
> Dear others,
> Please let me know your arguments in favour of Sequence Number (if any).
> 
> Best regards
> Ulrich
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 11:27 AM
> To: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: dime@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.3
> 
> 
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 5:23 PM, "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> here are comments to clause 4.3:
>> 
>> 1. Extensions in OC-OLR must either be mutually supported or must be ignorable. In the first case it is not enough for the reporting node to declare support of an extension in the sent OC-Feature-Vector AVP. For the second case there is no need to declare (or even define) support of an extension.
> 
> I am afraid I do not understand what you mean by above.
> 
>> Proposal is to expand the second sentence as follows:
>>   OC-OLR may also be used to convey additional information about mutually supportedextensions that are
>>   declared in the OC-Feature-Vector AVPs, and may also be used to convey additional ignorable information.
> 
> Not sure about the wording "ignorable information".. but otherwise ok with me.
> 
>> 
>> 2. TimeStamp has been replaced with Sequence-Number. This has the negative impact that reacting nodes must calculate the expiration time base on OLR-reception time. OLR reception time and OLR creation time  may be significantly different.
>> I don't see any reason in favour of Sequence-Number. Proposal is to replace Sequence-Number with TimeStamp.
> 
> I agree but you need to convince the others as well who favoured sequence number.
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Ulrich
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>