Re: [Dime] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <> Wed, 13 February 2019 04:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B8512D4F3 for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:13:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65JA340nlFNK for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1697012D4ED for <>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:13:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1D4DP4R055309 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:13:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1550031207; bh=OPsCnW9Pe9u6TmERZZA/OlJhpmG66WrudE99riX7lLs=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=T3gXLwvR0k6ty+klr/BFEUsLs+8G1jYmGbLRNCkRKM1n4TyrnemGRHwPud4DeVjnP 9oEZHNFpku/p2mfpJiOk2WNLjqpNsvB8ZLcPmLhEpFMc6/agXuA40bc+B0LMJdwSPA HjEN1iqqpi/PjmQd1C6AP2p+VQjwUU9vHK1pXNeQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: Host [] claimed to be []
From: Ben Campbell <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_69D671D0-2DC7-497A-B583-EB362803167F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:13:23 -0600
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Steve Donovan <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 04:13:30 -0000

Responding to one question below:

> On Feb 4, 2019, at 1:29 PM, Steve Donovan <> wrote:
>> Do you want to add this requirement as a "Note" on the IANA registry
>> itself?
> SRD> I don't understand the subtlety of the question.  Do you have
> suggested wording or can you explain what a "Note" on the IANA registry is?

I think Benjamin asks if we want IANA to put a note at the beginning of the registry with the requirement that new report type registrations need to indicate if they support rate.  If the answer is yes, I think that can be handled with an email to IANA rather than requiring a change to the draft. (It’s explicitly stated in the IANA considerations, so they might do so anyway.)