IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11E41A04F6 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:19:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAq8BAADVQK4 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC18C1A0048 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1L9J8cj003757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:19:08 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.34]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1L9J7Ql006734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:19:08 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC005.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.36) by DEMUHTC003.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:19:07 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.242]) by DEMUHTC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:19:07 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: ext Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
Thread-Index: Ac8u33cKdOS3EczGTrmu8FoNG7zaWgABUhNQ
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:19:06 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B4120@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
References: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783FFD@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209783FFD@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.112]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 935
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1392974348-00003660-C6215DD0/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/GKH09U_PLqP3DltOIPdcwJznjHs
Subject: Re: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:19:16 -0000

I do not agree
I think the conclusion was to say:
The OC-Supported-Features AVP MUST be included into every Diameter request message a DOIC supporting node sends.

For OC-Supported-Features AVP in answer messages refer to issue #30.

Ulrich  

-----Original Message-----
From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Maria Cruz Bartolome
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:35 AM
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] #51: OC-Supported-Features in requests - conclusions

#51: OC-Supported-Features in requests
 
My understanding is the following conclusions is reached:

 Now:
 The OC-Supported-Features AVP SHOULD be included into every Diameter
 message a DOIC
 supporting node sends (and intends to use for DOIC purposes).
 
Proposal:
replace SHOULD by MUST

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email