Re: [Dime] [dime] #53: 5.5.2 chapter typo?

Hi MCruz

The text  you propose to remove deals with the Seq number within  OC-Supported features, because of duplication with another text, but this other text text relates to the seq number handling within the OC-OLR AVP.
I think we can keep two texts, one for the seq number  within OC-Supported features  and another one for  the seq number  within OC-OLR AVP,. We will then see how the text  for seq number  within OC-Supported features evolves with the #29  outputs.

Best regards

JJacques

De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Maria Cruz Bartolome
Envoyé : vendredi 21 février 2014 16:42
À : dime@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Dime] [dime] #53: 5.5.2 chapter typo? - conclusion

Steve,

Extracted text is duplicated now, this paragraph I referred is simply wrong.
But I agree duplicated text should be revised due to issue#29, but this is up to this ticket to provide the alternative text.

Cheers
/MCruz

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: viernes, 21 de febrero de 2014 16:33
To: dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #53: 5.5.2 chapter typo? - conclusion

Maria Cruz,

I think we need to see the replacement text before concluding this ticket.

Steve
On 2/21/14 2:51 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome wrote:

#53: 5.5.2 chapter typo?

Following text will be deleted:

    .........  If the OC-Supported-Features AVP

    is received for the first time for the reporting node or the OC-

    Sequence-Number AVP value is less than the previously received/

    recorded one (and is outside the valid overflow window), then either

    the sequence number is stale (e.g. an intentional or unintentional

    replay) and SHOULD be silently discarded.

 As long as, the situations that it refers are covered later in the same chapter.

_______________________________________________

DiME mailing list

DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime