IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing

Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> Tue, 11 February 2014 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2561A075B for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:31:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZStgGipyA8a for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4531A0765 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-09-52fa96ab7a50
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 44.94.23809.BA69AF25; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:31:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB101.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.172]) by ESESSHC006.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.36]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:31:23 +0100
From: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org" <draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing
Thread-Index: AQHPJn6lXeCtSDWIB0ecpaPVZfAQkpqwlCoQ
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:31:23 +0000
Message-ID: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209773201@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
References: <057.f065e75bab4329d8222a3e0f41765194@trac.tools.ietf.org> <52F900AF.6020201@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F900AF.6020201@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B9209773201ESESSMB101erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6aab+CDK5MY7aY27uCzWLKij9M DkweS5b8ZPL4cvkzWwBTFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAldG565HLAUvzCvOPF3N1sA4x6yLkZNDQsBE 4sKumawQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBA4xSqxu72eGcJYwSjQtesQMUsUmYCdx6fQLpi5GDg4RgRKJ qW26IGFhoPDVxz1gJSIC9hKLLp9khLCNJD5+XQYWZxFQlbj4cAkTiM0r4Cvx/dUeMFtIIEti 3qa5YDangJ7Eyu7ZYPWMQAd9P7UGLM4sIC5x68l8JohDBSSW7DnPDGGLSrx8/A/qASWJtYe3 s0DU50v0bz7CArFLUOLkzCcsExhFZiEZNQtJ2SwkZbOAPmMW0JRYv0sfokRRYkr3Q3YIW0Oi dc5cdmTxBYzsqxjZcxMzc9LLjTYxAiPn4JbfqjsY75wTOcQozcGiJM774a1zkJBAemJJanZq akFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQbG9k8vLXdwGO+sF2tLmMIz03Lui5nW28wmXJgxe4Jvl1LVA5nD D+WNVt5fxfln4Q+BVd6BVfWnc/4uleK9e3NZfoyvW3qmR66J/KeQZ3/2nvnbVcfEYG23doPe 7tbOB9XWc7a8Tr3V9/1V2mXGj180pXyuXEhxui1VVHI4dsMCrd9+2uyvavozlViKMxINtZiL ihMBhSmwzmoCAAA=
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:31:29 -0000

Agreed

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: lunes, 10 de febrero de 2014 17:39
To: dime@ietf.org; draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org; ben@nostrum.com
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing

I agree with Ben, I don't see the need to include this definition.

Steve
On 2/7/14 2:41 PM, dime issue tracker wrote:

#39: Definition of Diameter Routing



 Do we need this definition? Diameter routing should be fully defined by

 the base specification.



 But if we do, I think the phrase "non-adjacent nodes" in the first

 sentence is misleading. Destination-Realm is also used to route between

 adjacent nodes, at least until you reach the node responsible for the

 ream+application. We should also include Application-Id.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email