[Dime] end to end security solution..

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 16 May 2016 18:37 UTC

To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <573A1375.4020003@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:37:41 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/Hd3wM5HVHSNPTrALDPXxoEjyNlc>
Subject: [Dime] end to end security solution..
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com

Folks,

In IETF95 we visited graveyard and reincarnated the discussion on e2e 
security. We do have one proposal on table: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-korhonen-dime-e2e-security-03

Putting aside the JSON vs. CBOR/COSE topic (i.e., forget the encoding 
method), I'd like to have the discussion whether the framework presented 
in the draft is actually acceptable and could serve as a starting point 
for the WG solution. Yes, this means you actually need to read the draft.

Regards,
	Jouni

[Dime] end to end security solution.. Jouni Korhonen