IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF06A1A8A95 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDm0M1WHWqL7 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.197.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D8AB1A8A91 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-97-99-50-102.tx.res.rr.com ([97.99.50.102]:57456 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1ZhO8v-003Szv-QG for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:38:27 -0700
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <20150930202736.3FFF61A8A56@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Message-ID: <560C4841.2090005@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:38:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150930202736.3FFF61A8A56@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000004070503000006080302"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/IDvTZd3YBcsIBl9r6-mFzyCENHQ>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:38:30 -0000

I'm okay with Jay's proposal on not specifying a default value.

Steve

On 9/30/15 3:27 PM, Lee, Jay wrote:
>
> Hi Steve and all,
>
> For the first proposal, as I indicated, I support increasing the 
> number of priority levels up to 16.
>
> I am also fine with the second proposal. My question is: do we need to 
> mandate this feature, as individual operators have different 
> situations? Perhaps some flexibility should be allowed? Instead of 
> mandating it, we can include the statement that when there is no DRMP 
> AVP, this correspond to ‘normal traffic’ without a particular high or 
> low priority. Then each operator can map this default to a value 
> (e.g., 8 or something else) that they feel appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jay
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status