Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #1

<> Mon, 02 December 2013 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA6E1AE355 for <>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:04:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkXA39Fcuthw for <>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177571A1F55 for <>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 00:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id F0F193B4127; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:04:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown []) by (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D84BF4C015; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:04:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:04:48 +0100
From: <>
To: "" <>, Jouni Korhonen <>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #1
Thread-Index: AQHO7zQNzQCE3TCNBEalkDVXC4zCcJpAi+8I
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:04:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version:, Antispam-Engine:, Antispam-Data: 2013.12.2.11814
Subject: Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01 questions #1
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:04:54 -0000

It was my understanding.

Envoyé depuis mon Sony Xperia SP d'Orange

Jouni Korhonen <>; a écrit :


In Section 2 on Diameter routing it says:

      defined in [RFC6733].  Application level routing specifications
      that expand on [RFC6733] also exist.

What does this "expand" actually refer to? RFC5729? RFC7075?

- Jouni
DiME mailing list


Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.