Re: [Dime] Charter update

jouni korhonen <jouni.korhonen@iki.fi> Fri, 17 August 2012 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A0E21F8577 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vN-2vdqzVHKR for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs15.mail.saunalahti.fi (vs15.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.117.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F25A21F8570 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vams (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vs15.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 00C1940080; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:39:38 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115]) by vs15.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD63C40080; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:39:37 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [10.255.128.118] (unknown [194.251.119.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29741151650; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:39:33 +0300 (EEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.korhonen@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <651528FD-F859-44B4-8978-460039563FC6@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 09:39:32 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6E3F1DC-AE1F-4491-B2CC-EE3BBFECB8BC@iki.fi>
References: <2D1E666F-1BA7-4FCA-800B-D01E5E5756D1@iki.fi> <196921E1-E38D-4342-AC06-57D0FB746394@nostrum.com> <78E86CCF-4D11-40BF-A02B-1F5364AECD65@iki.fi> <651528FD-F859-44B4-8978-460039563FC6@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: dime@ietf.org, dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Charter update
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:39:48 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 17, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:

> 
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:47 PM, jouni korhonen <jouni.korhonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
>>> Is this language intended to cover work on the mechanism as well as work on requirements? As written, it 
>> 
>> Yes. Sloppy wording. Lets try tweaking the wording a bit:
>> 
>> - Diameter overload control. The aim of this work is to identify the
>> limitations of the current Diameter base protocol overload control
>> mechanisms and based on the identified limitations define a set of
>> requirements for an overall Diameter overload control solution. The
>> solution would need to fulfill the requirements.
> 
> I may be being overly pedantic, but I still don't see that language as saying to actually define the solution. Here's a suggested further tweak:

I would day you are overly pedantic ;) However, the text you propose is
definitely better than mine!

> "- Diameter overload control. The aim of this work is to identify the
> limitations of the current Diameter base protocol for overload control purposes. Based on the identified limitations 
> the working group will specify a set of requirements for an overall Diameter overload control solution and define 
> a solution that meets those requirements."
> 
> Thanks!

- Jouni


> 
> Ben.