Re: [Dime] Strange paragraph in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-21
Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 18 July 2014 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD4E1A006C for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VzLsmodCuGxE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6108C1A0064 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id eu11so6179214pac.17 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nLtr21XwngMsgtt29PytlgpPrAy7Zs6/86/wZ8ObhSc=; b=eOR3kG2wfHVhS3H7y/BEiV/ttY5trtsNOKfETfTJ2VS24EmxHr/XM9ccCdJ+b1P3zs GCXR6sEpBhUwRLCvqV9maC37EBYSFftYuaUWDWiHzUBYSmyIyuEJrFr+xZ90wn1bMctf bYANTHVBs0vneujI5K67VQGhuAGtQh6SUvIVqKGcstzyGt9CEY3SqmgyJVj/RwMKheYX rzk1hEt3reuBhbgc1i1GRXU0b3Vju5r67AIyVklPTRA3wk8Ioi05KEtzlKJkRybbQFJB ndFUmSd4CgLUnJ0d7B05IkGJdg5aXwasX4c+xWSg5242q3tPRhkkaErYFiG9w998/voh yYIA==
X-Received: by 10.68.193.164 with SMTP id hp4mr8403177pbc.87.1405720676097; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.199.10.100] ([63.133.197.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kg1sm6577201pbc.22.2014.07.18.14.57.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53C9985F.4080908@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 00:57:51 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Holdrege <holdrege@gmail.com>, dime@ietf.org
References: <CAFtys5=Lqf1R385YmPxRWMwS78dbD96x9CwZ3w0G9rn1xf7tTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFtys5=Lqf1R385YmPxRWMwS78dbD96x9CwZ3w0G9rn1xf7tTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/KhuFv6vGTxwsHM_gYwOxDef07jc
Subject: Re: [Dime] Strange paragraph in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-21
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:57:58 -0000
Matt, RFC3588 has been obsoleted by RFC6733 (i.e. no use to look into 3588bis versions). - Jouni 7/18/2014 10:25 PM, Matt Holdrege kirjoitti: > Hi, > > Sorry to butt in with a minor nit, but I noticed that section 2.2 > appears to have mutually exclusive statements. > > 1. Connections between Diameter peers SHOULD be protected by TLS. > 2. The Diameter protocol MUST NOT be used without any security mechanism. > > I thought the text in RFC 3588 was ok, minus all the NAS bits? Or maybe > say that the "Diameter protocol must not be used without inclusive or > external transport layer security". Or some such text? > > -Matt > > > > _______________________________________________ > DiME mailing list > DiME@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >
- [Dime] Strange paragraph in http://tools.ietf.org… Matt Holdrege
- Re: [Dime] Strange paragraph in http://tools.ietf… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Strange paragraph in http://tools.ietf… Matt Holdrege