IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] New version of draft-wu-dime-local-keytran

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Wed, 09 December 2009 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F5B3A69D3 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:21:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.093, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnTdIw7Usy6C for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.82.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 188973A6956 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 18080 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2009 03:20:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (24.22.129.187) by p3plsmtpa01-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.83) with ESMTP; 09 Dec 2009 03:20:47 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'Sebastien Decugis' <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
References: <01ce01ca7842$352c49b0$9f84dd10$@net> <4B1F0642.2090604@nict.go.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4B1F0642.2090604@nict.go.jp>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:20:19 -0800
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <009a01ca787e$89fb4a40$9df1dec0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acp4dFDDkR7LDecJQXCTjVmQ6HjtDQACb6BQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] New version of draft-wu-dime-local-keytran
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:21:00 -0000

Sebastien Decugis [mailto:sdecugis@nict.go.jp] writes:

> Hi Glen, Qin, all,
> 
> By quickly looking into the new version, a few additional comments came
> to my mind:
> 
> In section 3.1, I would like to propose a change to the ABNF. I think
> the Key-Type AVP should be in a fixed position (actually I was under the
> impression that this was already decided, but anyway), like this:
> 
>    Key ::= < AVP Header: AC1 >
>              < Key-Type >
>              ...
> 
> 
> In section 3.1.1 (definition of Key-Type AVP), I think some of the
> defined values should be removed, as follow:
> - rMSK (4) : As I understand, there is no difference between rMSK and
> MSK, so we may not need a different type for this one ? (not sure)

How would you deliver an MSK and rMSK in the same message, then?

...

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status