IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> Wed, 26 March 2014 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904301A0316 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B8Xcy2Q2FqT6 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg21.ericsson.net [193.180.251.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77251A019C for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb28-b7f8e8e000007f0a-73-5332ba5e83dc
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B9.9D.32522.E5AB2335; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:30:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB101.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.123]) by ESESSHC006.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.36]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:30:38 +0100
From: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
Thread-Index: AQHPSGyHo/hRJOjvGke2FwEBr47Q4ZrzPCpA
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:30:37 +0000
Message-ID: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B92097A0CAF@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
References: <5331ED2E.4030507@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <5331ED2E.4030507@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B92097A0CAFESESSMB101erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7cLqNgg0m7DC3m9q5gs9jQxOPA 5LFkyU8mj1Vv+1gDmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mh7v3sBcsE2/YuKkLuYGxluaXYycHBICJhKL X3ezQ9hiEhfurWcDsYUETjBKzOgs72LkArKXMEo82XqCFSTBJmAncen0CyYQW0TAV+J452kW EFtYwFii+cszqLiJxO2vF5khbCOJG98g6lkEVCWm/4KI8wL1/rh2hBVima7E2r+vwBZzCuhJ 3PzQCVbDCHTQ91NrwHqZBcQlbj2ZzwRxqIDEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/8BzeEAshUllvfLQZTnS0y4 co0FYpWgxMmZT1gmMIrMQjJpFpKyWUjKIOI6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQxjnznwmAlZfAEj+ypG yeLU4uLcdCNDvdz03BK91KLM5OLi/Dy94tRNjMDYOrjlt8YOxu5r9ocYpTlYlMR5q2Z2BgkJ pCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgbP4bGh46O2C5lk7/AZmJpxvfm0gZPQyf4G2Y4rpR 6q1BbqPg3JkxnZdSv7T6FXKHt5+p+RD3OX6CfsCB7/HHf8Sl7ZjluLq11imAad8KQeWtRZHO Tt8fJxYJuYTcXOHasUh7rs1KoVVJp1wTlBcviWNIYAiSWfxg9v3zUbKnL3B4vKn4tu+bEktx RqKhFnNRcSIAZzS6t3sCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/NNVQG2fEr2CbVgk-k74FJowevb8
Subject: Re: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 11:30:43 -0000

Steve, all,

In my opinion RRR term is misleading.
I think we need to come up with a name that clearly could differentiate from "Realm".
Then, my proposal is to do not modify that in draft.
If later, finally we consider "all requests to realm" report, then we would need to come up with a better terminology.
Cheers
/MCruz

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve Donovan
Sent: martes, 25 de marzo de 2014 21:55
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] Issue #23 - Proposed resolution

All,

Given that we do not have consensus on removing Realm-Routed-Request reports, I propose that we resolve issue 23 by renaming what is called Realm reports in the -01 draft to Realm-Routed-Reports in the -02 draft.

I will update the issue with the text changes when I make them, but I will do nothing but change the name and make the wording consistent in that Realm-Routed-Reports apply to requests sent to the realm that do not have a Destination-Host AVP.

Regards,

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email