[Dime] Clashing AVP codes
Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Fri, 10 June 2011 09:16 UTC
Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D0421F851C for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jibtbNplVdVd for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C6521F851B for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1699711fxm.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4dujeP60pkUTxU762YDjp/ppluoWIeXpvT+soPnMvzQ=; b=l3mUnvj2NliOgvd8+oIaHPv7ZoW7/b04aQfQXSxAZCSbSIOQfGo1Mdgxpjojtp+Auu fiQGgKjQwXbUu9IDFRYrqDYIH+N4Y4OwGS9II2vaTjFMsVmBxFne0R4Gcsk0yoidKtdm hue0Tu1L0ZpK+rbw2BF5eBzHKszW1O/rcFneI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=GDZEoRdpKV7hKZb8zpUxcpJRw+DOwbhzoVHBwt6Jj+bG0NpoKGrlK4Mv/r8tBJTZnJ CBt5oFSG11NT+HqsaxaHDWq7DvKV77NHiGO0mE9CKNA50x96VwKyHa1ojhaUwjcEt1F+ UmcQ0QRdh43qWDGSEhE67ecIbtHACyNkEW4hY=
Received: by 10.223.79.151 with SMTP id p23mr1772125fak.78.1307697390110; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.81.72 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:46:10 +0530
Message-ID: <BANLkTikq=i8ORZvWDtd3GNVfeCn5Xv1bUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015173ff29c69477704a55806b5"
Subject: [Dime] Clashing AVP codes
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:16:38 -0000
Hey! There are two AVPs (Filter-Id, 3GPP-Session-Stop-Indicator) defined in 3GPP specification 32.299 with same value 11. Can anyone tell which one of them is the correct one? Yours, Naveen.
- [Dime] Clashing AVP codes Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: [Dime] Clashing AVP codes lionel.morand