Re: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing

"dime issue tracker" <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org> Fri, 07 February 2014 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B35B1A0488 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:45:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8VSKRRGWzT32 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A231A0478 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48933 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1WBsIE-0003Uh-H4; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:44:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dime issue tracker <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org, ben@nostrum.com
X-Trac-Project: dime
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:44:58 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/39#comment:1
Message-ID: <072.86c3403c16322c0a18c7803e95c20bff@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <057.f065e75bab4329d8222a3e0f41765194@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 39
In-Reply-To: <057.f065e75bab4329d8222a3e0f41765194@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org, ben@nostrum.com, dime@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: ben@nostrum.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #39: Definition of Diameter Routing
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: dime@ietf.org
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:45:07 -0000

#39: Definition of Diameter Routing


Comment (by ben@nostrum.com):

 (Oops, sent to soon). The last sentence says "It is possible to enhance
 the routing decision with application-level knowledge..." The passive
 voice obscures the responsibility. What actor may do this? (I suggest
 recasting the sentence as "XXX may enhance..."

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-docdt-dime-
  ben@nostrum.com        |  ovli@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor        |   Milestone:
Component:  draft-       |     Version:  1.0
  docdt-dime-ovli        |  Resolution:
 Severity:  Active WG    |
  Document               |
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/39#comment:1>
dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>