Re: [Dime] [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09

S Moonesamy <> Thu, 16 August 2012 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9437021F85CD; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.604
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WR2y9EKINjE2; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7CE21F85B8; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7GGGFPd016947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1345133788; bh=1CVDZs2mT3J+cQNFNCagB9II2o1mqQ80GmxQKDB+ugk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=LA2QkarofnMq37poogMYUeDjmQOvfuW4ePHC/3HPn+a+2NGbV4YANtZoFv4CfWRey mIuLtsLoNkFkmxCikvFLn2QR2JkfusXi4fBsxUXuNvCtVdNPFktaHptMCFneFO9ToV UidZIT/moHRiu2V0G4YHc4ZAx7083lTc8/2Nyz+E=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1345133788;; bh=1CVDZs2mT3J+cQNFNCagB9II2o1mqQ80GmxQKDB+ugk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XAbNq6FofGm1OVenuh6djhaEJLKQmA7oIv8VCM9Q3iRfDbTaHw7GI12PoMKfmOvmH cI6Lv6mANR7JFOpsKsjhpOd0i8dqd+9NGsorB2jOUQAy5UulIgoJt0Kb9ymmCIZiDS uRlYJRG3JMbO6hBuD5v/3vJ7diVOhICJhMYMmBfg=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:09:36 -0700
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:16:52 -0700
Subject: Re: [Dime] [apps-discuss] Review of: draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:16:31 -0000


I received a comment about the Applications Area Directorate 
(APPSDIR) review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09 ( 
).  There is some background information about the Applications 
Directorate at 
Some information for document authors is available at I'll highlight 
the following:

   "In plain English, this means that the comments in the Applications Area
    Directorate review does not bear more weight than a comment submitted by
    an individual during a Last Call."

There was a Publication Request on May 23 for 
draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis.  I assume that the draft is ready for 
review.  APPSDIR tries to perform early reviews, i.e., catch issues 
early so the document authors have more time to address the 
issues.  It is up to the authors, or working group, to decide about 
whether the issues should be resolved and how to do so.

If you have any questions about APPSDIR you can contact the 
undersigned or post a message to the mailing list.

S. Moonesamy