[Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP
Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2010 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7F23A6816 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.132
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5T9Mwfc9Tgch for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2CC3A67B6 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so42148vws.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:received :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GJp2I/KwrN6EcnQPxTTjD5MXnAkfTI9OC8NwmAyBU7o=; b=dBKpySIlzbqBufc2qECsX5Hy/Uj9UMrjQ8b9EXeJJNwKXuITQUS0+bcJUcCtB1dzto fuDhW3qHhCy2m3i+hsHTxRfYgLjuLK2lTEjuQvnC513Sgs2g47Y+nfH0X9qwUt7AAVHD mgcROWtPRtU+0p61rm6tPiuGem4Yowqwd4PjE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=MFmYZEejdgZFlqCYthDXuWOOSJltAzsnbVyB7LTpnOuGKRtokIAZaRKswh+XTzdUoS xxeq+1fEKba5thOw6aRoBW0GnbvAiaw9HvXf0x6ZuKbEj+LhiuQ+ZcaYO3mGR2rzzS8g fu+QTr2FgiVtBBhPRNzM/9oq7cJ9bknfravFA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.125.78 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:36:56 +0100
Received: by 10.220.47.220 with SMTP id o28mr1295939vcf.6.1270042636126; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <s2yce72e8461003310636z294f083of823a022c19bf29d@mail.gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6464f582d0d86048318d8ab"
Subject: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:36:51 -0000
Hi, Am just wondering whether the mis-sequencing in the delivery of packets when SCTP is being used as transport layer would cause any problem. For example, take an association with 5 out-streams to send out the Diameter messages. Immediately after sending CEA on stream 0, all other messages are sent over other streams like 1, 2, 3, and 4. There is a chance that the other Diameter messages will reach the peer before the CEA is processed? Does the existing draft miss the sequencing problem over SCTP? Yours, Naveen.
- [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Tom Taylor
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Sebastien Decugis
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Ralph Loader
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Nilanjan
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Naveen Kottapalli
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Ralph Loader
- Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP Naveen Kottapalli