IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dime] draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes: DISCUSS/Comments addressed in rev 13

Mark Jones <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com> Wed, 21 October 2009 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F09528C13F; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUm8HVNXD1cu; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bean.electric.net (bean.electric.net [72.35.23.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245AF28C113; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1N0hbd-0001zk-TU by bean.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>) id 1N0hbd-00025w-Vc; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:25 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:25 -0700
Received: from [72.35.6.119] (helo=webmail.bridgewatersystems.com) by bean.electric.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>) id 1N0hbd-0001zk-TU; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:16:25 -0700
Received: from m679t05.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com ([10.52.81.148]) by m679t01.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com ([10.52.81.144]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:25 -0400
From: Mark Jones <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:16:20 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes: DISCUSS/Comments addressed in rev 13
Thread-Index: AcpSi1qysGpnVRZiQHKsCMHC+hzvnw==
Message-ID: <4E0F60BAF2FA7C46BBB5474DF8A89BCD2DD4822DEA@m679t05.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-IP: 72.35.6.119
X-Env-From: Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com
X-PolicySMART: 781633
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (s)
Subject: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes: DISCUSS/Comments addressed in rev 13
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:16:22 -0000

I'm working on the next rev of the DIME QoS Attributes draft and just noticed that I neglected to send the description of the changes made for the previous revision (-13). 

Assuming better late than never, here is the summary of the IESG DISCUSS and comments addressed in rev 13 published on July 13th:

+ Amanda Babar (IANA), Tue.June 16th
	- TCP-Flag-Type: Fixed in rev 13.
	- Questions answered and actions confirmed on Wed. June 17th

+ Lothar Reith, Sun. June 21st
	- Issue1: QoS-Resources description. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Issue 2: Not an issue. Replied Tue, June 30th.
	- Issue 3: Charging granularity. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Issue 4: Not an issue. Replied Tue, June 30th.
	- Issue 5: Improve QoS-Semantic desc. Replied Tue, June 30th. Fix needed.
		. Replied with text on Mon, Aug 10th. To be fixed in rev 14
	- Issue 6: Rework DCCA example. Replied Tue, June 30th. Fix needed.
		. Replied Mon, Aug 10th. To be fixed in rev 14
	- Issue 7: DCCA Typo. Replied Tue, June 30th. 
		. Obsolete with DCCA example reworking.
	- Issue 8: Rework DCCA example. Replied Tue, June 30th. Fix needed.
		. Replied Mon, Aug 10th. To be fixed in rev 14

+ Gonzalo Camarille, Wed. June 24th
	- Expand AVP and ABNF acronyms in Abstract.
		. To be fixed in rev 14.
	- Remove reference to RFC4005 from Abstract
		. To be fixed in rev 14.

+ Ralph Droms, Mon Jun 29th
	- Typos fixed in rev 13. Replied on Tue, June 30th.

+ Lars Eggert, Wed Jul 1st
	- DISCUSS-DISCUSS: Why TCP Options? Avi replied on Aug 7th.
	- DISCUSS: Firewall functionality. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Comment: Ports context within transport protocol.  Fixed in rev 13.
	
* Adrian Farrel, Wed Jul 1st
	- Comment: Figure 1 and 5 alignment issues. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Comment: Section 5 action wording. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Comment: Identify IANA registries. Fixed in rev 13.
	
* Magnus Westerlund, Thu July 2nd
		. Replied on Mon July 13th
	- Discuss: Normative ref to formal language (notation). Fixed in rev 13.
	- Discuss: 4.1.7.2 Missing ref to imported definitions. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Discuss: 5.1 Missing info necessary for actions. Not an issue.
	- Discuss: 10.1 Missing registries. Fixed in rev 13.
	- Discuss: 10.2/10.3 Clarify new registry. Fixed in rev 13.

Stay tuned for rev 14. Coming soon. ;)

Regards
Mark

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status