IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 09 January 2017 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57635129D04 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:22:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjdKyi4pnMQw for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22904129CF6 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BBBBE49 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:54 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54LZImZ3hcMS for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.28.172.2] (unknown [185.51.75.90]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94246BE39 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:21:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1483971713; bh=ocDVbLFoOdhyIroSK0japMGoVx5iqRsmPy4tcDY368s=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:From; b=PY3aeNCyNOfwuR3pCNA4ill+F6yuRE54Lf5mwCplswMOsNPIMCwne4fV8YWJ7oyWy GrmG8cyU/PxvmNnOGZAKnJ8ZzDIX/elBLuoqFL3G0/krQ0DJ3ty0jk9W0AHbbHb/jJ WGtOoahzpkwcuD3S3xL80KFauFLNp3kWC1d284JQ=
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <c7ccbd98-2475-c58d-e4dc-9a173ec6dcc7@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:21:52 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020800040909050404030402"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/SbaYD-R5HrQCQHCuM36b3iIGEAw>
Subject: [Dime] AD review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload-08
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:22:15 -0000

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay with this - it was mis-routed to
Katheeen's queue somehow.

I've done my AD review and will start IETF LC shortly.

I agree with the shepherd that the i-d nits output can be
ignored;-)

My nitty comments below can be handled as part of IETF
LC,

Cheers,
S.

- section 2: might be nice to add "Diameter agent" to this
section. Either that or just eliminte this section if
these terms are defined already elsewhere.

- 5.1.1: OC_PEER_REPORT is very abruptly introduced.  A
sentence to describe it or point to where it's defined
(6.1.1 I guess) would maybe be good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email