Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-10.txt
Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Wed, 25 July 2012 07:50 UTC
Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0257421F84EB for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXzAbyImj3ps for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A7221F84E1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so1013149pbc.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=NAv6SWMP6A/kfbpK3l9porxP+fHXh8LMiHCulwTpxM8=; b=rvEJzhfwGP4D4xRETE1AD1got3sAuB195bSQLqur5SvdOAdAGhF4a2hkV33Z0N41Q+ Ee0yeNinBHMu2FZiEmViqkcqSobHGszXO3bPYZc4QXja8oQhm2qDkiY5DJB4miZ4AOsr 7PB1irzg3U2af5ZNj/BLmVdw0iUKV543vLEuSSG6IM45nYON1MCa4SQbltJNXL9WzBQm a+d25OEXYTW4k2ZOqGfTs/JzaTRAUgyRV3hgZuE8Dl5WW79KnLs7xaIIi+LrrQs6VTZs pJiyv4YWNSIYgEyGzmSN13ZqqBLRwA2bhNCEqFFElRPHtzOVFpbPjq7zqpqVWOGCVhGz V2Ww==
Received: by 10.68.200.138 with SMTP id js10mr52332192pbc.23.1343202613535; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-110-169-210-180.revip5.asianet.co.th. [110.169.210.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rg10sm13863945pbc.54.2012.07.25.00.49.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <500F08AF.4010102@cisco.com>
References: <20120715054226.4612.98302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <500F08AF.4010102@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-3f71c1IkKroXtcZqk2tG"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:49:05 +0700
Message-ID: <1343202545.7688.181.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Cc: dime mailing list <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:50:15 -0000
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 13:42 -0700, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Glen, > > Thanks for this new version. > Two points that need to be addressed. > > > 1. It seems that you have forgotten what we agreed upon on the mailing > list. > > > How about this? > > OLD: > 3. Diameter NAS Application Messages > > This section defines the Diameter message Command-Code > [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] values that MUST be supported by > all > Diameter implementations conforming to this specification. > The > Command Codes are as follows: > > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > | Command Name | Abbrev. | Code | > Reference | > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > | AA-Request | AAR | 265 | > Section 3.1 | > | AA-Answer | AAA | 265 | > Section 3.2 | > | Re-Auth-Request | RAR | 258 | > Section 3.3 | > | Re-Auth-Answer | RAA | 258 | > Section 3.4 | > | Session-Termination-Request | STR | 275 | > Section 3.5 | > | Session-Termination-Answer | STA | 275 | > Section 3.6 | > | Abort-Session-Request | ASR | 274 | > Section 3.7 | > | Abort-Session-Answer | ASA | 274 | > Section 3.8 | > | Accounting-Request | ACR | 271 | > Section 3.9 | > | Accounting-Answer | ACA | 271 | > Section 3.10 | > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > > NEW: > 3. Diameter NAS Application Messages > > This section defines the Diameter message Command-Code > [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] values that MUST be supported by > all > Diameter implementations conforming to this specification. > The > Command Codes are as follows: > > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > | Command Name | Abbrev. | Code | > Reference | > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > | AA-Request | AAR | 265 | > Section 3.1 | > | AA-Answer | AAA | 265 | > Section 3.2 | > | Re-Auth-Request | RAR | 258 | > Section 3.3 | > | Re-Auth-Answer | RAA | 258 | > Section 3.4 | > | Session-Termination-Request | STR | 275 | > Section 3.5 | > | Session-Termination-Answer | STA | 275 | > Section 3.6 | > | Abort-Session-Request | ASR | 274 | > Section 3.7 | > | Abort-Session-Answer | ASA | 274 | > Section 3.8 | > | Accounting-Request | ACR | 271 | > Section 3.9 | > | Accounting-Answer | ACA | 271 | > Section 3.10 | > > +-----------------------------------+---------+------+--------------+ > > Note that the message formats in the following sub-sections > use the standard Diameter Command Code Format > ([I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis], Section 3.2). > > > > 2. To be complete, and to let the DIME WG know, let me include what we > have exchanged in a private email regarding the IANA pointer for the > application id 1. > > You asked for a statement and some consistency from the IESG. > - statement: The reference should be where the item in question is > documented, not what registered it. > - consistency: right, we need to make this clear and not change it. > Michelle Coton and Barry Leiba are working on an update to BCP 26 that > will, in part, do just that, and you are welcome to comment on it when > it's posted (during or shortly after IETF 84). > > I propose that you add an "IANA note" in the IANA security section of > draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-09.txt expressing something such as: as > discussed with the IESG, application id 1 should point to > <RFC4005bis.> > > > > Please include those two points in the next revision of the draft, and > I'll progress the draft to IETF LC. I'll submit it Monday evening. ...
- [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-… Benoit Claise