Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Issue
"Askerup, Anders" <anders.askerup@hp.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 15:20 UTC
Return-Path: <anders.askerup@hp.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68921A02A3 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:20:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RqHcgQGuvC3S for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com (g4t0015.houston.hp.com [15.201.24.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C460F1A01F7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from G9W0364.americas.hpqcorp.net (g9w0364.houston.hp.com [16.216.193.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g4t0015.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E078040; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:20:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G9W3611.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.216.186.46) by G9W0364.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.216.193.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:19:32 +0000
Received: from G9W0747.americas.hpqcorp.net ([169.254.4.56]) by G9W3611.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.216.186.46]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:19:32 +0000
From: "Askerup, Anders" <anders.askerup@hp.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org" <draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Issue
Thread-Index: AQHPJk5fRafru9tHlEacmwX02VY39JqzUONA
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:19:32 +0000
Message-ID: <602542051F40544EB188D494F506C2494792DEA2@G9W0747.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <057.23609e95665c9eb1e8580a31702a64b0@trac.tools.ietf.org> <213D2B01-4A4F-4C06-9272-B93D98F629BC@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <213D2B01-4A4F-4C06-9272-B93D98F629BC@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [16.210.48.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Issue
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:20:41 -0000
In addition, there is no such thing as Destination-Server AVP :) Destination-Server -> Destination-Host /Anders -----Original Message----- From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 4:53 AM To: dime@ietf.org Cc: ben@nostrum.com; draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Issue Good point. I would clarify that a server farm could mean both: one with a single identity and one with multiple identities. The selection is implementation and deployment specific. - Jouni On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:37 PM, dime issue tracker <trac+dime@trac.tools.ietf.org> wrote: > #38: Server Farm Definition Issue > > A "server farm" is defined as "A set of Diameter servers that can handle > any request for a given set of Diameter applications.". This is not > strictly true. For example, if a request includes a Destination-Server > AVP, then then in general only that particular server in the farm can > handle the request. > > I assume that we don't mean to limit the server farm concept to situations > where the entire farm is known by a single Diameter-Identity, do we? > > -- > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-docdt-dime- > ben@nostrum.com | ovli@tools.ietf.org > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: minor | Milestone: > Component: draft- | Version: 1.0 > docdt-dime-ovli | Keywords: > Severity: Active WG | > Document | > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/38> > dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/> > _______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Issue dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Iss… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Iss… Askerup, Anders
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Iss… Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Iss… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38: Server Farm Definition Iss… Maria Cruz Bartolome
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): Se… dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #38 (draft-ietf-dime-ovli): Ser… dime issue tracker