Re: [Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Tue, 25 May 2010 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91263A68CE for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.074, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-zyRkmlbKhX for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.99]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD9043A6CE7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1299 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 09:40:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (111.84.166.252) by smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.99) with ESMTP; 25 May 2010 09:40:27 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'jouni korhonen' <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <10A80F70-2ED3-4A02-9711-7A5ED6C702D1@gmail.com> <0F3F1973-63CA-41E1-903A-35D3894D507D@gmail.com> <017301cafbce$09c10580$1d431080$@net> <1033CE87-B78F-4765-9F50-29FEDE6D03CE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1033CE87-B78F-4765-9F50-29FEDE6D03CE@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:40:13 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <018301cafbee$4b648eb0$e22dac10$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acr76h2Khe3bmqJwTmO3lCrJv+A67wAAw9kg
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Another round of WGLCs and WG status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:40:40 -0000

jouni korhonen [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com] writes:

> On May 25, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Glen Zorn wrote:
> 
> > jouni korhonen [mailto://jouni.nospam@gmail.com] writes:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We can conclude from the WGLC that local-keytran and also pririty-
> avps
> >> (though we got only 2 comments..) can move on. Authors, provide
> >> revisions that addresses all comments on your documents and we'll
> move
> >> them forward.
> >
> > It would be helpful if the chairs would provide a list of the accepted
> > changes since (in the case of local-keytran, at least) not all
> comments were
> > valid.
> 
> We could hold your hand as well ;) 

The last time I checked, modifications to WG drafts were made by WG
consensus _only_ & the responsibility for determining WG consensus was that
of the WG Chairs, _not_ the document editor(s).  

> Anyway, seriously, I though to put
> all stuff to tracker (just like RADEXT started to do) if folks would be
> OK with that. 

It's a great idea, but only if you want to stop all progress (as the "tool"
was used to great effect by the radext chairs).

> It is a bit more spam on the list but would be rather
> clear to follow each separate topic assuming folks would use it
> systematically.

This includes you, of course: you still have to make clear which changes are
OK & which are not.  Is it too much trouble to send an email stating the
changes to be made?

> 
> Regarding the local-keytran case, which part of the comments you refer
> here? Domains?

All of them: the only comments I've seen on any of Joe's or Tom's comments
have been mine.

> 
> - Jouni
> 
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
>