IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Wed, 04 May 2016 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2913412D508 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WJ-2AB9zCuGo for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.197.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B74112D504 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 May 2016 07:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cpe-97-99-50-102.tx.res.rr.com ([97.99.50.102]:59215 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1axxOM-002w90-IV for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 07:03:12 -0700
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <20160428150420.27801.59309.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Message-ID: <572A011A.4060901@usdonovans.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 09:03:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160428150420.27801.59309.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/XFvcn0yc3lwylC9bcXg7aMx6a3M>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 14:03:18 -0000

I'm responding to the comments received in the order received.

Please see my responses inline.

Regards,

Steve

On 4/28/16 10:04 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-drmp/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In Section 6: excuse my ignorance, but how can priority information be
> conveyed to non-supporting endpoints (in 2 places)? And what is the
> point,as they don't support the extension?
SRD> This is to cover the case where there exists a Diameter client that 
does not support the DRMP mechanism originates a request.  An agent that 
does support the mechanism can, in this case, add the DRMP AVP to the 
message if it has the information needed to accurately add the priority 
information.
>
> In 9.1: it would be better to just have a table, instead of copying and
> modifying lots of text.
SRD> That's another way of presenting the information.  I think the 
existing approach works as well.
>
> It would be good to have a short sentence saying how this extension
> affects non upgraded agents.
SRD> I don't understand this comment.  This does not impact non 
supporting Diameter nodes.  A non supporting agent will just ignore the 
DRMP AVP.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email