Re: [Dime] Ben's suggested change on 8, 1st paragraph

Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Thu, 15 January 2015 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E8C1B2BE0 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-grgMMFnItA for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E336D1B2BD7 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:40:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:54643 helo=Steves-MacBook-Air-2.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (UNKNOWN:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1YBkf2-00075I-Ad for dime@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 05:40:33 -0800
Message-ID: <54B7C350.4040906@usdonovans.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:40:32 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dime@ietf.org
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681523F0BD@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681523F0BD@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060703050100030200050504"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srd+usdonovans.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/XK_xwimPRtszLqAi9a5l5ahRKpc>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Ben's suggested change on 8, 1st paragraph
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:40:34 -0000

Clients can reject requests sent by servers.  I don't see the issue.

On 1/15/15 3:59 AM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> Ben wrote:
> -- 8, 1st paragraph:
> This is just for agents and servers, not clients, right? If so, "When 
> a DOIC node..." is too broadly stated.
> <Ulrich> I agree
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime