[Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels

"Lee, Jay" <Jay.Lee@VerizonWireless.com> Fri, 25 September 2015 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Jay.Lee@VerizonWireless.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005AE1B29AE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbE6vC9tq6Wh for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vanguard.verizonwireless.com (vanguard.verizonwireless.com [162.115.35.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B445E1B29AA for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizonwireless.com; i=@verizonwireless.com; q=dns/txt; s=prodmail; t=1443167205; x=1474703205; h=from:to:date:subject:mime-version; bh=HoCRAaywwUfmVw+VkCCIPTetWyu3O+qNF8pV7QH5IF0=; b=jcLqF581+DuleMXjfEThNL97YcAGkJ8QYbd6E2xf6gKOkQMTt6+ukTaK 5bhy5BdusXMLijhlFoAQLfovNEole8QDhTdMzwnM2B5DN09KzHhscREyL I/3NQTlekINkLN3OTSLn0q7Tt8a935Vu4obmRSPqO+tsdbH7WBGZ3v3fb s=;
X-Host: taurus.sdc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from ohdub02exhub01.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.97.42.201]) by vanguard.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2015 00:46:44 -0700
Received: from OHDUB02EXCV43.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([fe80::7823:7c58:b820:863c]) by OHDUB02EXHUB01.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.97.42.201]) with mapi; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:46:44 -0400
From: "Lee, Jay" <Jay.Lee@VerizonWireless.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 03:46:43 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
Thread-Index: AdD3Ze1yhLyKz8Z/SICFkW2yPTZNCw==
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD46CAB168565540B56D65D1C472DD6101A2E90CD3OHDUB02EXCV43_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20150925074645.B445E1B29AA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/XLBLhXOn_QC_2D05K9ZU13Lb2vg>
Subject: [Dime] [dime] #92 (drmp): Range of priority levels
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:46:47 -0000

Hi all,

I support JJacques's proposal on extending the range of priority levels up to 16. Verizon prefers having 7-8 priority levels, and having another 8 priority levels for future use is fine with us. So Verizon supports a total of 16 priority levels, as JJacques proposed.

Thanks,

Jay