Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54
"Shishufeng (Susan)" <susan.shishufeng@huawei.com> Wed, 07 May 2014 02:03 UTC
Return-Path: <susan.shishufeng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1DE1A03BE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 19:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlYhcsCutUrj for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 19:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB4A1A01C9 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2014 19:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BGL99035; Wed, 07 May 2014 02:03:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:01:44 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.38) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 7 May 2014 03:03:00 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.124]) by SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 7 May 2014 10:02:49 +0800
From: "Shishufeng (Susan)" <susan.shishufeng@huawei.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54
Thread-Index: AQHPZjjTsQPB8zG0E0KJ1aFvD1ADS5svp5GQgANpUQCAAVDnsA==
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 02:02:49 +0000
Message-ID: <26C84DFD55BC3040A45BF70926E55F2587C4E8E1@SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <53639A8D.9050106@usdonovans.com> <26C84DFD55BC3040A45BF70926E55F2587C4E154@SZXEMA512-MBX.china.huawei.com> <5368E7F0.8060109@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <5368E7F0.8060109@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.146.62.57]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_26C84DFD55BC3040A45BF70926E55F2587C4E8E1SZXEMA512MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/aL2M4xCADQuKuHPXV8fsbYAIO7w
Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 02:03:09 -0000
Hi Steve, As I know, there was no conclusion on that after last email exchange on that. As I clarified, with this AVP as mandatory, it does not bring benefit while may introduce error cases. There is no need for the server to always add this useless AVP in the report. I still prefer to keep it as optional, which was supported by most of 3GPP colleagues. As mentioned many times, this Diameter overload control feature will be mainly used by 3GPP. And to my knowledge, all people could live with it as optional. Thus please revert the change if possible. Best Regards, Susan From: Steve Donovan [mailto:srdonovan@usdonovans.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:47 PM To: Shishufeng (Susan); dime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 Susan, I made the change based on direction set by Lionel as working group chair and document shepherd. Regards, Steve On 5/3/14, 8:42 PM, Shishufeng (Susan) wrote: Hello Steve, May I know when and how this AVP becomes required? My understanding is that there is no strong reason to make it as mandatory. Best Regards, Susan From: Steve Donovan [mailto:srdonovan@usdonovans.com] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:16 PM To: dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org> Subject: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 All, I am starting the processing of trying to address the open issues for the DOIC draft. For issue #54, the -02 draft shows the report-type AVP as being required. As such, I propose that we close this issue. If I don't hear any objections I will close it early next week. Regards, Steve
- [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 Shishufeng (Susan)
- Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] DOIC: Proposal to close #54 Shishufeng (Susan)