Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance andExtensions (dime)
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 13 January 2012 06:40 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E644D21F84E2; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:40:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.167
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.167 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.431, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khbkF+T5aY8j; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369F321F849B; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXQ004HV56EMI@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXQ0089956ETZ@szxga03-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGK56535; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:49 +0800
Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:38 +0800
Received: from w53375q (10.138.41.130) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:38 +0800
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:39:37 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.130]
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
Message-id: <C4E99957E47946738B95ADB0311A24FE@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_CJ0OBoOpPYNtfrO0+8V4aQ)"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <20120111163717.591B021F87EF@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F0DC78D.2010809@cs.tcd.ie> <D689F28F-7837-401D-816B-A701EE09AE09@gmail.com> <4F0ECE57.3020900@cs.tcd.ie> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0406F494C6@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <4F0FA62D.4090808@gmail.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A040153198F@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Cc: IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com, dime@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance andExtensions (dime)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:40:04 -0000
RE: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)Count me. I remember there was an initial individual submission from Glen and me regarding end to end security topic. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zorn-dime-n2n-sec-lite-01 unfortunetely not finished due to lacking energy in the last year . This may serve as a good input to this topic although more input are needed. Regards! -Qin ----- Original Message ----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) To: Glen Zorn Cc: IETF-Discussion ; jouni.korhonen@nsn.com ; lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com ; dime@ietf.org ; iesg@ietf.org ; Stephen Farrell Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 2:14 PM Subject: Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance andExtensions (dime) Thanks, Glen! Can we see (at least) a couple of more hands from people willing to participate in the editing of this document? Dan -----Original Message----- From: Glen Zorn [mailto:glenzorn@gmail.com] Sent: Fri 1/13/2012 5:34 AM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Cc: Stephen Farrell; jouni korhonen; jouni.korhonen@nsn.com; lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com; dime@ietf.org; IETF-Discussion; iesg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime) On 1/12/2012 7:15 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Hi, > > If a number of hands were raised now and the folks commanding them say > 'we are ready to work on this NOW' I would support including explicit > wording in the charter. Consider my hand raised. If this does not happen until the telechat next > week the current text is good enough to allow interested people to start > working on contributions that can be individual submissions. If these > submissions are consistent enough the WG can add the milestone later in > the charter and adopt the submissions as WG items. > > Dan > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of >> Stephen Farrell >> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:13 PM >> To: jouni korhonen >> Cc: jouni.korhonen@nsn.com; lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com; >> dime@ietf.org; IETF-Discussion; iesg@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenance and >> Extensions (dime) >> >> >> Hi Jouni, >> >> Right, I'm trying to encourage this - I'm not trying >> to make it a gating function for the recharter. Its >> still worth doing though if we can find some victims >> with enough energy:-) >> >> I agree that the current charter text might not need >> to be modified, OTOH, if there were folks who wanted to >> do the work, a milestone might be good. I also agree >> that as of now, that addition is not warranted. >> >> Cheers, >> S >> >> On 01/12/2012 12:08 PM, jouni korhonen wrote: >>> >>> Stephen, >>> >>> This topic raises its head every now and then when a Dime >>> document arrives at IESG ;) Apart from that there has been >>> very little serious public discussion about it recently, >>> for some unknown reason to me. A detail worth pointing out >>> is that the support for the End-to-End security framework >>> (E2E-Sequence AVP and 'P'-bit in the AVP header) has been >>> deprecated in RFC3588bis (now in IESG). So we are "free" >>> to start from scratch. >>> >>> If there is enough serious energy and vision for pursuing >>> end-to-end security, I do not see current proposed charter >>> text prohibiting it: >>> >>> "- Maintaining and/or progressing, along the standards track, the >>> Diameter Base protocol and Diameter Applications. This includes >>> extensions to Diameter Base protocol that can be considered as >>> enhanced features or bug fixes." >>> >>> I would argue the end-to-end security is an enhanced feature for >>> Diameter base protocol that fixes a serious bug/flaw in security. >>> On the other hand, if an explicit note is needed about this topic >>> in the charter, I might hesitate to include such in this round. >>> I would first like to see some concrete movement& work around >>> this topic. >>> >>> - Jouni >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> During the IESG internal review of this I asked whether >>>> or not there was interest in trying to tackle end to >>>> end security for AVPs. I do know there is at least some >>>> interest in that but its not clear there's enough to >>>> warrant including it in the re-charter so I said I'd >>>> ask when the recharter went out for review... >>>> >>>> So - anyone interested in DIME solving that problem? >>>> (And willing and able to help do the work of course.) >>>> >>>> As of now, Diameter really only has hop-by-hop security >>>> which is ok in many cases but far from ideal (wearing >>>> my security hat) in some. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Stephen. >>>> >>>> On 01/11/2012 04:37 PM, IESG Secretary wrote: >>>>> A modified charter has been submitted for the Diameter Maintenance >> and >>>>> Extensions (dime) working group in the Operations and Management >> Area of >>>>> the IETF. The IESG has not made any determination as yet. The >> modified >>>>> charter is provided below for informational purposes only. Please >> send >>>>> your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by >> Wednesday, >>>>> January 18, 2012. >>>>> >>>>> Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime) >>>>> ----------------------------------------- >>>>> Current Status: Active >>>>> >>>>> Last Modified: 2012-01-10 >>>>> >>>>> Chairs: >>>>> Lionel Morand<lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com> >>>>> Jouni Korhonen<jouni.korhonen@nsn.com> >>>>> >>>>> Operations and Management Area Directors: >>>>> Dan Romascanu<dromasca@avaya.com> >>>>> Ronald Bonica<rbonica@juniper.net> >>>>> >>>>> Operations and Management Area Advisor: >>>>> Dan Romascanu<dromasca@avaya.com> >>>>> >>>>> Mailing Lists: >>>>> General Discussion: dime@ietf.org >>>>> To Subscribe: > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >>>>> Archive: >>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/maillist.html >>>>> >>>>> Description of Working Group: >>>>> >>>>> The Diameter Maintenance and Extensions WG will focus on >> maintenance and >>>>> extensions to the Diameter protocol required to enable its use for >>>>> authentication, authorization, accounting, charging in network >> access, >>>>> provisioning of configuration information within the network, and >> for >>>>> new AAA session management uses within the extensibility rules of >> the >>>>> Diameter base protocol. >>>>> >>>>> The DIME working group plans to address the following items: >>>>> >>>>> - Maintaining and/or progressing, along the standards track, the >>>>> Diameter Base protocol and Diameter Applications. This includes >>>>> extensions to Diameter Base protocol that can be considered as >> enhanced >>>>> features or bug fixes. >>>>> >>>>> - Diameter application design guideline. This document will > provide >>>>> guidelines for design of Diameter extensions. It will detail when >> to >>>>> consider reusing an existing application and when to develop a new >>>>> application. >>>>> >>>>> - Protocol extensions for the management of Diameter entities. > This >> work >>>>> focuses on the standardization of Management Information Bases >> (MIBs) to >>>>> configure Diameter entities (such as the Diameter Base protocol or >>>>> Diameter Credit Control nodes). The usage of other management >> protocols >>>>> for configuring Diameter entities may be future work within the >> group. >>>>> >>>>> - Protocol extensions for bulk and grouped AAA session management. >> The >>>>> aim of this work is to study and standardize a solution for >> handling >>>>> groups of AAA sessions within the Diameter base protocol context. >> The >>>>> solution would define how to identify and handle grouped AAA >> sessions in >>>>> commands and operations. >>>>> >>>>> Additionally, Diameter-based systems require interoperability in >> order >>>>> to work. The working group, along with the AD, will need to >> evaluate any >>>>> potential extensions and require verification that the proposed >>>>> extension is needed, and is within the extensibility rules of >> Diameter >>>>> and AAA scope. Coordination with other IETF working groups and >> other >>>>> SDOs (e.g. 3GPP) will be used to ensure this. >>>>> >>>>> Goals and Milestones: >>>>> >>>>> Done - Submit the following two Diameter Mobility documents to >> the >>>>> IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standards:* >> 'Diameter >>>>> Mobile IPv6: Support for Home Agent to Diameter Server >>>>> Interaction' * 'Diameter Mobile IPv6: Support for >> Network >>>>> Access Server to Diameter Server Interaction' >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter API' to the IESG for consideration as >> an >>>>> Informational RFC >>>>> Done - Submit 'Quality of Service Parameters for Usage with >>>>> Diameter' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed >>>>> Standard. >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter QoS Application' to the IESG for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Support for EAP Re-authentication >>>>> Protocol' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter User-Name and Realm Based Request >> Routing >>>>> Clarifications' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Proxy Mobile IPv6' as DIME working >> group >>>>> item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Quality of Service Attributes for Diameter' to >> the >>>>> IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Proxy Mobile IPv6' to the IESG for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter User-Name and Realm Based Request >> Routing >>>>> Clarifications' to the IESG for consideration as a >> Proposed >>>>> Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter NAT Control Application' as DIME >> working >>>>> group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Capabilities Update' as DIME working >> group >>>>> item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Credit Control Application MIB' to the >>>>> IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Base Protocol MIB' to the IESG for >>>>> consideration as an Informational RFC >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Capabilities Update' to the IESG for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Extended NAPTR' as DIME working group >> item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter' as DIME >>>>> working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 > Localized >>>>> Routing' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Attribute-Value Pairs for > Cryptographic >>>>> Key Transport' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Priority Attribute Value Pairs' as > DIME >>>>> working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter IKEv2 PSK' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit Revision of 'Diameter Base Protocol' to the IESG >> for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Attribute-Value Pairs for > Cryptographic >>>>> Key Transport' to the IESG for consideration as a >> Proposed >>>>> Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Priority Attribute Value Pairs' to the >>>>> IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit Revision of 'Diameter Network Access Server >>>>> Application - RFC 4005bis' as DIME working group item >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter NAT Control Application' to the IESG >> for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter IKEv2 PSK' to the IESG for >> consideration >>>>> as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Extended NAPTR' to the IESG for >>>>> consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Done - Submit 'Diameter Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 > Localized >>>>> Routing' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed >>>>> Mar 2012 - Submit 'Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter' to the > IESG >>>>> for consideration as a Proposed Standard >>>>> Mar 2012 - Submit Revision of 'Diameter Network Access Server >>>>> Application - RFC 4005bis' to the IESG for >> consideration as a >>>>> Proposed Standard >>>>> May 2012 - Submit 'Diameter Application Design Guidelines' to the >> IESG >>>>> for consideration as a BCP document Standard >>>>> Jul 2012 - Submit 'Diameter Support for EAP Re-authentication >>>>> Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed >>>>> Standard >>>>> Aug 2012 - Submit a document on 'Protocol extension for bulk and >> group >>>>> signaling' as a working group item >>>>> Aug 2013 - Submit a document on 'Protocol extension for bulk and >> group >>>>> signaling' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed >>>>> Standard >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> IETF-Announce mailing list >>>>> IETF-Announce@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ietf mailing list >>>> Ietf@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >>> > _______________________________________________ > DiME mailing list > DiME@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenan… IESG Secretary
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Tom Taylor
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Mark Jones
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Alan DeKok
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maintenan… IESG Secretary
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Qin Wu
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Glen Zorn
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] WG Review: Recharter of Diameter Maint… Stephen Farrell