Re: [Dime] AD review draft-ietf-dime-app-design-guide

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lionel,

Thanks for the new version.
See in line
>
>
>
> - When I read the document, it looked to me as a BCP.
>
> BCP definition from RFC 2026:
>
>     5.  BEST CURRENT PRACTICE (BCP) RFCs
>
>       
>
>         The BCP subseries of the RFC series is designed to be a way to
>
>         standardize practices and the results of community deliberations.
>
> Interestingly, the charter mentions:
>
> May 2012, Submit 'Diameter Application Design Guidelines' to the IESG 
> for consideration as a BCP document
>
> */[LM] discussed in another email thread./*
>
>
> If you go to BCP, don't forget to update the abstract, and the writeup.
>
Abstract:

    It is meant as a guidelines document and
    therefore as informative in nature.

I would remove this sentence. Informative and BCP don't go along very well.

Jouni, don't forget to update the writeup.

>
> *//*
>
> *//**//**//*
>
>
> - Editorial in section 5.7
> OLD:
>
> Destination- Realm
>   
> NEW:
> Destination-Realm
> */
> /*
Still there.
>
>
> *//**//*
>
>
>
> - Section 5.9
>
>   Applications that do not understand these AVPs can discard
>     them upon receipt.
>
> Generic comment: Each time there is a sentence like this one above, we 
> should mention RFC 6733 as the reference.
> This document is not an extension/deviation to RFC 6733.
>
> */[LM] ok/*
>
Still there.
>
> *//*
>
> *//*

Regards, Benoit