Re: [Dime] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 05 May 2016 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6760F12DBAC; Thu, 5 May 2016 07:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmC9mx8e13Ol; Thu, 5 May 2016 07:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D823B12DAA0; Thu, 5 May 2016 07:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB8FBE32; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:39:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFu2HjxVMeH2; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:39:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B46BCBE2D; Thu, 5 May 2016 15:39:01 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1462459142; bh=6iGuWHvjY2cvHTcvpuYYSVMTsGLdCs/S+EHGDmFYYeM=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=o/wJht7IB4YpgQJfLJUNuGDBjgfAP6BC+o6wbcfKxiJe7VVFg+N3Ydq6Hj6Iqvf/L feVlnqOyz1reRNME6DO9MDKT9rG3NT7MyYh76Z+jd6vq/mjf7SjrDoONn5xwyvzpoK Omxe+X2HxSTPJRwOQzuWIhqWtFDgN462Cu1wqiq0=
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <20160503213139.8362.8871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8354_1462318968_57293778_8354_15408_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01E4C8AE@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <572A1C14.5020907@usdonovans.com> <74A5239A-329E-4F82-9FBF-497C9D906E89@cooperw.in> <572A4520.5090101@cs.tcd.ie> <90C95598-F68D-4F94-8AE3-FAFF403F560E@cooperw.in> <572AFD9D.7010909@cs.tcd.ie> <CF2919CA-DE13-44C1-8430-DD5B8D8DB252@cooperw.in> <572B48D2.6090801@cs.tcd.ie> <154814f98f0.277f.0301301ad371d4c21d5a2092e0e442f2@usdonovans.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <572B5B0D.9010001@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 15:39:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154814f98f0.277f.0301301ad371d4c21d5a2092e0e442f2@usdonovans.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms020602000508070607090303"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/bkxU1I7sAt8xfP5cS_E-cmpePb8>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-drmp@ietf.org, dime-chairs@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-drmp-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 14:46:07 -0000

Great. I think we're maybe at the point where pushing out a
revised I-D that has the fixes we now know we want would be a
good plan and then we can go back around the discuss holders
and see where we're at.

Make sense? If not, then please continue the discussion to
get us there.

Cheers,
S.

On 05/05/16 15:25, Steve Donovan wrote:
> I'm okay with this addition.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> On May 5, 2016 8:21:22 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 05/05/16 14:19, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> > I think the gap is in Section 5, where it should be noted that in
>> > order for priority information to be reliably usable in the way that
>> > use cases 5.1 and 5.2 call for, the Diameter nodes sending and
>> > consuming it must have pre-established trust relationships of the
>> > sort described in Section 11.
>>
>> Sounds reasonable to me. Authors?
>>
>> S.
>>
> 
>