[Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14691A0080 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:44:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZR9w0N5DHFzw for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92ED1A0190 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1J8ii0B024450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:44:44 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1J8iitB021574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:44:44 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC012.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.43) by DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:44:44 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.242]) by DEMUHTC012.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:44:43 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Issue#29 proposed conclusion
Thread-Index: Ac8tTtW08OOXi3GFTYCACj/qENR9Rg==
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:44:43 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3B73@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.126]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3B73DEMUMBX014nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 2770
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1392799484-00003660-0CE3EB51/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/cd9oBeP2z-xoVOiAt0tuUG-Fmoo
Subject: [Dime] Issue#29 proposed conclusion
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:44:51 -0000

#29: OC-Sequence-Number in OC-Supported-Features

Dear all,

I have received comments from Lionel, Jouni and Steve;
I understand that Lionel and myself support removal of OC-Sequence-Number AVP from OC-Supported-Features AVP while Jouni has no strong view.  I'm not sure whether Steve is convinced by the response given to his comments.

In summary I dare to propose that we conclude in favour of removing OC-Sequence-Number from OC-Supported-Features.

Ulrich