Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP

Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Wed, 31 March 2010 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C523A682C for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoO7D9ap4lpr for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A3B3A6807 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so241636vws.31 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=TKBI/WCWo+EefL/zGxg7oM8pmYap28/V9Hzjo+etLNI=; b=u3jNr7Nr5mxK994DvNx+jslAvCEIzBCTs+eRvR1Or5olmvNRceXA/nSMgi3qk8s+jH BSKzUqEOgzrE9ghVLIWGCwQGpltxD2hj4Aw/K3QPDOEXXeWKAEn5/OVNR9q7V8vCdUiG MWJ7WPgMX9OAnjMuzlU5TT90HbQsw3ZVgBKkc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=D/FDxRzxBZGrKY7yfw9rwsJ4DPCF5rrbZgKhUsfulpmBIrf63+ywKf6ED2y8f36u2o w7Q7Wa++ocV+6gda0U4061kL5G+NpSuyBTX6KyhJ6OgNpJskOxJ4eknwdHY/JCrY/Ss5 puJJBQmUfj1xHGwRQCotKjKJIhYjZ1rbtZwrY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.125.78 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <x2kce72e8461003311307v115181dcs4a95541d7fedccb4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <s2yce72e8461003310636z294f083of823a022c19bf29d@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP10B5C02EA204511F92B61AD81E0@phx.gbl> <x2kce72e8461003311307v115181dcs4a95541d7fedccb4@mail.gmail.com>
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:08:40 +0100
Received: by 10.220.107.167 with SMTP id b39mr4502245vcp.16.1270066140173; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <k2lce72e8461003311308rfe606513se3939e87f64fd002@mail.gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00c09f8fe4502059c304831e5148"
Subject: Re: [Dime] Message mis-sequencing over SCTP
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:08:34 -0000

I feel, we can handle the same way as SIGTRAN is handling.

Yours,
Naveen.


  On 31 March 2010 14:51, Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> wrote:

> Sounds like a good point. Seems to me the rules should be:
>
>  - use only stream 0 until the Diameter connection has been set up
>  - all messages relating to the same session must use the same stream.
>
> That should be added to section 2.1.1.
>
>
> Naveen Kottapalli wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> Am just wondering whether the mis-sequencing in the delivery of packets
>> when
>> SCTP is being used as transport layer would cause any problem.  For
>> example,
>> take an association with 5 out-streams to send out the Diameter messages.
>> Immediately after sending CEA on stream 0, all other messages are sent
>> over
>> other streams like 1, 2, 3, and 4.
>>
>> There is a chance that the other Diameter messages will reach the peer
>> before the CEA is processed?   Does the existing draft miss the sequencing
>> problem over SCTP?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Naveen.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>