Re: [Dime] Updated Diameter QoSspecification(draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos)

I still plan to distribute a summary about the changes in response to
the review comments.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On 
>Behalf Of ext Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
>Sent: 22 February, 2010 12:21
>To: Hannes Tschofenig; dime@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Dime] Updated Diameter 
>QoSspecification(draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos)
>
>Although all DISCUSSes were cleared the document still needs 
>one YES or NO-OBJ ballot in order to be approved. I sent a 
>message to the six AD's who did not yet enter ballot positions 
>asking them to review the document and enter a position. 
>
>Thanks and Regards,
>
>Dan
> 
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
>> Of Hannes Tschofenig
>> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 9:36 PM
>> To: dime@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Dime] Updated Diameter QoS
>> specification(draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos)
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have re-submitted an updated version of the Diameter QoS 
>application 
>> specification in an attempt to address the comments raised by the 
>> IESG. Details about the comments can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-diameter-qos/#ballot
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>DiME mailing list
>DiME@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>