Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5777 (2337)

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@nsn.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A28E3A68F1 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUlWb5Vtdc8u for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0767C3A6783 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o6M6e5io014958; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:40:05 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o6M6e3F0017220; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:40:05 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:40:02 +0200
Received: from 10.144.225.109 ([10.144.225.109]) by FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.182]) via Exchange Front-End Server 10.150.128.35 ([10.150.128.35]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:40:01 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:40:01 +0300
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@nsn.com>
To: ext Mark Jones <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, "mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com" <mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com>, Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>, "dromasca@avaya.com" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com" <lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com>
Message-ID: <C86DC271.153CF%jouni.korhonen@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5777 (2337)
Thread-Index: Acsnw+ulQwrFrqVCQM+ze2fORLP79QAQ8H/QAFhB/R8=
In-Reply-To: <B4B762B06D90774E9E8016C89B66AF87588DB9A1@m679t05.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2010 06:40:02.0635 (UTC) FILETIME=[B68EF1B0:01CB2968]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:44:36 -0700
Cc: "francois@tera.ics.keio.ac.jp" <francois@tera.ics.keio.ac.jp>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5777 (2337)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:40:02 -0000

>From a Dime co-chair point of view I agree with the errata #2337 if/when the
correction below asked by Mark is added.

- Jouni


On 7/20/10 3:36 PM, "ext Mark Jones" <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>
wrote:

> The RFC5777 authors have discussed this errata with Francois Bard prior to
> submission.
> 
> However, there is a typo in the first sentence of the proposed corrected text:
> "Absolute-Start-Fractional-Seconds" should read
> "Absolute-End-Fractional-Seconds".
> 
> With this correction, we agree that it should proceed to IESG verification.
> 
> Regards
> Mark
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
>> Sent: July 20, 2010 12:28 AM
>> To: jouni.korhonen@nsn.com; Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net;
>> mayutan.arumaithurai@gmail.com; Mark Jones; Avi Lior;
>> dromasca@avaya.com; rbonica@juniper.net; lionel.morand@orange-
>> ftgroup.com; jouni.korhonen@nsn.com
>> Cc: francois@tera.ics.keio.ac.jp; dime@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-
>> editor.org
>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5777 (2337)
>> 
>> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5777,
>> "Traffic Classification and Quality of Service (QoS) Attributes for
>> Diameter".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5777&eid=2337
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Francois Bard <francois@tera.ics.keio.ac.jp>
>> 
>> Section: 4.2.10
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> The Absolute-End-Fractional-Seconds AVP (AVP Code 569) is of type
>> Unsigned32.  The value specifies the fractional seconds that are
>> added to Absolute-End-Time value in order to determine when the time
>> window ends.  If this AVP is absent from the Time-Of-Day-Condition
>> AVP, then the fractional seconds are assumed to be zero.
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> The Absolute-Start-Fractional-Seconds AVP (AVP Code 569) is of type
>> Unsigned32.  The value specifies the fractional seconds that are
>> added to Absolute-End-Time value in order to determine when the time
>> window ends.  The Absolute-End-Fractional-Seconds represent
>> a 32-bit fraction field giving a precision of about 232 picoseconds
>> ( 1/((2^32)-1)) seconds ).  If this AVP is absent from the Time-Of-Day-
>> Condition AVP, then the fractional seconds are assumed to be zero.
>> See the Network Time Protocol [RFC 1305] for more precision.
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The AVP description lacked a explanation about what a fractional second
>> is.
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5777 (draft-ietf-dime-qos-attributes-15)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Traffic Classification and Quality of Service
>> (QoS) Attributes for Diameter
>> Publication Date    : February 2010
>> Author(s)           : J. Korhonen, H. Tschofenig, M. Arumaithurai, M.
>> Jones, Ed., A. Lior
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Diameter Maintanence and Extensions
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG