Re: [Dime] DIME WG Call for adoption draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 06 September 2012 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3B321F8546 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K11EsWsYuft4 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (vicuna.estacado.net [4.30.77.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6CE21F8530 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.159] (99-152-144-32.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.144.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q86DwREA099513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:58:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
References: <1FD6C07D-675B-4190-832C-D07F59DF1CF1@gmail.com> <0BF1FFDF-FD6A-4122-A58A-61BB7905BC00@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <0BF1FFDF-FD6A-4122-A58A-61BB7905BC00@nostrum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <6A704613-9DD9-42BC-9399-A02AF650EC74@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:58:26 -0500
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] DIME WG Call for adoption draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:58:51 -0000

I do as well.

/a

On Sep 6, 2012, at 8:51, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:

> I support making this draft a work group item. (I assume that's obvious, but still worth stating for the record :-)  )
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ben.
> 
> On Sep 6, 2012, at 3:31 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> This email starts a two week consensus call on adopting:
>> 
>>    Title           : Diameter Overload Control Requirements
>>    Author(s)       : Eric McMurry
>>                        Ben Campbell
>>    Filename        : draft-mcmurry-dime-overload-reqs-02.txt
>>    Pages           : 25
>>    Date            : 2012-08-28
>> 
>> as a Dime WG document.  Please state your opinion (either for or
>> against) on making this draft a WG draft either on the mailing list or
>> to the chairs.  This call will end September 20, 2012.
>> 
>> - Jouni & Lionel
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime